首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Increased Arterial Stiffness in Prediabetic Subjects Recognized by Hemoglobin A1c with Postprandial Glucose but Not Fasting Glucose Levels
【2h】

Increased Arterial Stiffness in Prediabetic Subjects Recognized by Hemoglobin A1c with Postprandial Glucose but Not Fasting Glucose Levels

机译:血红蛋白A1c与餐后血糖但不禁食血糖水平可识别的糖尿病前期受试者的动脉僵硬度增加

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous studies exploring the association between arterial stiffness and prediabetes remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate the association of the different domains of prediabetes categorized by glycated hemoglobin A1c (A1c) 5.7–6.4%, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), fasting plasma glucose of 5.6–6.9 mmol/L, and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), two-hour post-load glucose of 7.8–11.0 mmol/L, on arterial stiffness. These were measured by brachial–ankle pulse-wave velocity (baPWV). We enrolled 4938 eligible subjects and divided them into the following nine groups: (1) normoglycemic; (2) isolated A1c 5.7–6.4%; (3) isolated IFG; (4) IFG with A1c 5.7–6.4%; (5) isolated IGT; (6) combined IGT and IFG with A1c <5.7%; (7) IGT with A1c 5.7–6.4%; (8) combined IGT and IFG with A1c 5.7–6.4%; and (9) newly diagnosed diabetes (NDD). The baPWV values were significantly high in subjects with NDD (β = 47.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 29.02–66.37, p < 0.001), those with IGT with A1c 5.7–6.4% (β = 36.02, 95% CI = 19.08–52.95, p < 0.001), and those with combined IGT and IFG with A1c 5.7–6.4% (β = 27.72, 95% CI = 0.68–54.76, p = 0.044), but not in the other subgroups. These findings suggest that increased arterial stiffness was found in prediabetes individuals having an A1c 5.7–6.4% with IGT, but not IFG. Isolated A1c 5.7–6.4% and isolated IGT were not associated with elevated arterial stiffness.
机译:先前研究动脉僵硬度与糖尿病前期之间关系的研究仍存在争议。这项研究旨在研究糖化血红蛋白A1c(A1c)5.7–6.4%,空腹血糖(IFG)受损,空腹血糖5.6–6.9 mmol / L和糖耐量受损(IGT)归类的前驱糖尿病的不同领域之间的关联。 ),负荷后两小时血糖为7.8–11.0 mmol / L,对动脉僵硬。这些是通过肱-踝脉搏波速度(baPWV)测量的。我们招募了4938名符合条件的受试者,并将其分为以下9组:(1)正常血糖; (2)孤立的A1c 5.7–6.4%; (3)孤立的IFG; (4)IFG的A1c为5.7–6.4%; (5)孤立的IGT; (6)IGT和IFG合并,A1c <5.7%; (7)IGT,A1c为5.7–6.4%; (8)结合IGT和IFG,A1c为5.7–6.4%; (9)新诊断的糖尿病(NDD)。在NDD患者中,baPWV值显着较高(β= 47.69,95%置信区间(CI)= 29.02–66.37,p <0.001),IGT A1c患者为5.7–6.4%(β= 36.02,95%CI = 19.08–52.95,p <0.001),以及将IGT和IFG与A1c合并的患者为5.7–6.4%(β= 27.72,95%CI = 0.68–54.76,p = 0.044),但在其他亚组中除外。这些发现表明,IGT的A1c为5.7–6.4%的糖尿病前期个体,但IFG的却没有发现动脉硬化。孤立的A1c 5.7–6.4%和孤立的IGT与动脉僵硬度升高无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号