首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Clinical Course of Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema Treated with Nepafenac
【2h】

Clinical Course of Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema Treated with Nepafenac

机译:用Nepafenac治疗假脂型囊状黄斑水肿的临床课程

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: To evaluate the clinical course of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME) treated with topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Methods: An analysis of the clinical course of PCME consisting of 536 eyes of 536 patients from five consecutive randomized clinical trials aimed at the optimization of anti-inflammatory medication in patients undergoing routine cataract surgery. PCME was classified as (i) grade 0a; no macular thickening, (ii) grade 0b; macular thickening (central subfield macular thickness (CSMT) increase of at least 10%) without signs of macular edema, (iii) grade I; subclinical PCME, (iv) grade II; acute PCME, (v) grade III; long-standing PCME. Eyes with PCME classification from grade I onwards were treated with nepafenac 1 mg/mL t.i.d. for two months. Results: CSMT increase of at least 10% at any postoperative timepoint with cystoid changes—a criterion for PCME—was found in 19 of 536 eyes (total incidence 3.5%). Of these 19 eyes, 13 eyes (total incidence 2.4%) had clinically significant PCME. PCME was considered clinically significant when both of the following visual acuity criteria were fulfilled. At any timepoint after the cataract surgery both the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) gain was less than 0.4 decimals from that of preoperative CDVA, and the absolute CDVA level remained below 0.8 decimals. Only one of the 19 eyes with criteria for PCME (total incidence 0.2%, incidence of PCME eyes 5.3%) showed no macular edema resolution within 2 months after topical nepafenac administration. Conclusions: PCME in most cases is self-limiting using topical nepafenac without any further need for intravitreal treatment.
机译:背景:评价用局部非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)治疗的假磷酸囊泡黄斑水肿(PCME)的临床进程。方法:分析PCME的临床进程,由536只536名患者组成的536名连续的随机临床试验,旨在在经营常规白内障手术中的抗炎药中的优化。 PCME被归类为(i)0A级;没有黄斑增厚,(ii)0B级;黄斑增稠(中央子场黄斑厚度(CSMT)增加至少10%)没有黄斑水肿的迹象,(III)等级;亚临床PCME,(iv)二级;急性PCME,(v)三年级;长期的PCME。从I级级别的PCME分类的眼睛用Nepafenac 1 mg / ml t.d治疗。两个月。结果:CSMT在任何术后时间点的CSMT增加至少10%,囊拓改变 - PCME的标准 - 在536只眼中发现了PCME(总发生率3.5%)。在这19只眼睛中,13只眼(总发生率2.4%)在临床上具有临床显着的PCME。当满足以下两种视力标准时,PCME被认为是临床意义。在白内障手术后,校正距离视力(CDVA)增益均小于术前CDVA的校正距离视力(CDVA)增益的任何时间点,绝对CDVA水平仍然低于0.8小数。只有19只眼睛中只有一个PCME标准(总发生率为0.2%,PCME眼的发病率5.3%)在局部Nepafenac给药后2个月内没有在2个月内显示出Matema水肿分辨率。结论:PCME在大多数情况下是使用局部Nepafenac自限制,无需进一步需要玻璃体内治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号