首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Smokers’ and Young Adult Non-Smokers’ Perceptions and Perceived Impact of Snus and E-Cigarette Modified Risk Messages
【2h】

Smokers’ and Young Adult Non-Smokers’ Perceptions and Perceived Impact of Snus and E-Cigarette Modified Risk Messages

机译:吸烟者和年轻的成人非吸烟者的看法和患者的感知和感知对鼻和电子烟改装风险信息的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although no tobacco products are safe, tobacco companies in the United States may request regulatory authorization to make certain “modified risk tobacco product” (MRTP) claims in their marketing. However, few qualitative studies have explored consumer perceptions and understanding of comparative risk messages and wordings. We examined consumer perceptions of statements indicating reduced risks and exposure to chemicals from snus and e-cigarettes relative to smoking. We conducted 12 focus groups with adult smokers (ages 21–66) and young adult (YA) non-smokers (ages 18–25) (n = 57) in the USA in 2019. Participants shared reactions to modified risk and exposure messages and message variations. Participants largely understood claims, including language about “switching completely.” However, participants expressed desire for more message specificity, evidence, risk reduction reasons, and statistics/quantitative information. Claim believability and acceptance was also limited by existing negative product beliefs and experiences, negative media reports, and skepticism about message source. YAs did not express product interest based on message exposure. Some YAs suggested the included “smoker” language made the messages less interesting/relevant. Given existing proposals for and use of MRTP messages, additional research on their wording, framing, delivery, and effects may help inform regulatory or organizational decisions about such messages, optimize potential benefits, and mitigate unintended consequences.
机译:虽然没有烟草制品是安全的,但美国烟草公司可以要求监管授权,以使某些“修改风险烟草产品”(MRTP)索赔在其营销中。然而,很少有定性研究探索了消费者的看法和对比较风险消息和措辞的理解。我们检查了对陈述的消费者看法,表明相对于吸烟的Snus和电子卷烟的化学品降低,以及对吸烟的降低。我们在2019年与成人吸烟者(年龄21-66岁)和年轻成人(YA)非吸烟者(年龄18-25岁)(N = 57岁)进行了12个焦点小组。参与者分享了修改风险和曝光信息的反应消息变化。参与者在很大程度上理解了索赔,包括关于“完全切换的语言”。然而,参与者表示希望更多信息特异性,证据,降低风险原因和统计/定量信息。索赔可信度和验收也受到现有的负面产品信仰和经验,负面媒体报告和关于信息来源的怀疑论。 YAS没有根据消息曝光表达产品兴趣。一些YAS建议包含的“吸烟者”语言使信息不太有趣/相关。鉴于现有的提案和使用MRTP消息,对其措辞,框架,交付和效果的额外研究可能有助于为这些信息提供通知监管或组织决策,优化潜在利益,并减轻意外后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号