首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Children in South Africa with and without Intellectual Disabilities’ Rating of Their Frequency of Participation in Everyday Activities
【2h】

Children in South Africa with and without Intellectual Disabilities’ Rating of Their Frequency of Participation in Everyday Activities

机译:南非的儿童没有智障障碍的日常活动频率的评级

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In a low-and middle-income country (LMIC) such as South Africa, not much is known about how children with intellectual disabilities (ID) participate in everyday activities, as no studies to date have compared their participation to peers without ID from the same background. Using a newly developed, contextually valid measure of participation, Picture my Participation (PmP), 106 children with (73) and without ID (33), rated their frequency of participation in activities of daily living. Previous international research has established that children with ID tend to participate less frequently than children without ID in everyday activities outside of the school setting. However, much of this research is based on proxy ratings from caregivers rather than children with ID themselves. There is a growing body of evidence that suggests children with disabilities have uniquely different views of their own participation than their caregivers. The existing research evidence is also delimited to studies conducted predominantly in high income contexts (HICSs). Since it is universally acknowledged that participation patterns are affected by the environment, it is important to evaluate the generalizability of the current evidence to LMICs. The current study found that there were many similar patterns of participation between the two groups although significant differences were noted in social, community, leisure and self-care activities. We compare these results to findings from studies conducted in HICs and find that there are similarities but also differences across contexts. This study highlights the importance of gaining a child’s perspective of participation and understanding how intellectual disability can affect participation relative to peers without ID in LMICS.
机译:在南非等中等收入国家(LMIC)中,众所周知,知识产权(ID)如何参与日常活动,因为迄今为止没有学习的学习将其参与未经证据相同的背景。使用新开发的上下文有效的参与度量,图片我的参与(PMP),106名儿童(73),没有ID(33),评为他们参与日常生活活动的频率。以前的国际研究已经确定,id的儿童往往比学校环境之外的日常活动中没有身份证的孩子更少参与。然而,这项研究的大部分都是根据护理人员而不是身份人士自己的儿童的代理评级。有一个日益增长的证据表明残疾儿童对自己参与的观点具有比他们的照顾者的唯一看法。现有的研究证据也界定到主要在高收入范围内进行的研究(HICSS)。由于它普遍承认,参与模式受环境的影响,重要的是评估当前证据的概括性对LMICS的普遍性。目前的研究发现,两组之间存在许多相似的参与模式,尽管社会,社区,休闲和自我保健活动中指出了显着差异。我们将这些结果与HICS中的研究的结果进行比较,并发现存在相似之处,但在上下文中也存在差异。本研究突出了获得儿童参与的观点的重要性,并了解知识分子残疾如何相对于没有身份证的同行会影响参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号