首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Research on Pricing and Service Level Strategies of Dual Channel Reverse Supply Chain Considering Consumer Preference in Multi-Regional Situations
【2h】

Research on Pricing and Service Level Strategies of Dual Channel Reverse Supply Chain Considering Consumer Preference in Multi-Regional Situations

机译:考虑到多区域局势消费者偏好的双通道反向供应链定价与服务水平策略研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Facing the increasingly serious waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) recycling problem, recycling enterprises actively introduce online recycling channels, build dual channel reverse supply chains (DRSC), and use high-level recycling price and service levels to enhance consumers’ recycling enthusiasm and recycling amount. Nevertheless, in China, where the imbalance of regional development is widespread, the recycling center, third-party recycler (TPR), and third-party platform (TPP) are faced with the choices of pricing and service level when facing multi-regional consumers. This paper mainly answers the following questions: (1) When the recycling center and TPP introduce online recycling channels in multi-regional situations, how should they set online recycling price, transfer price, and service level? (2) When consumer preference for online channels changes in a certain region, how should recycling enterprises adjust their optimal pricing and service level decisions for different regions to maximize their own profits? How do the profits of recycling enterprises change? In order to solve the above problems, in this paper, we propose three pricing and service level decision models for the recycling center with online channels, namely, keeping prices unchanged, unifying all prices, and maximizing its own profits. By using the Stackelberg game to solve the model, we get the optimal pricing, service level decisions, as well as the maximum profits of the recycling center, TPP, and TPR when consumer preference changes. By analyzing the results of the model, we find that the change of consumer preference for online channels in a certain region will affect the decision and profits of multi-regional recycling enterprises. Specifically, consumer preference for online channels in a certain region will not only lead to an increase in the profits of the recycling center and TPP and a decrease in the profit of local TPRs, but also an increase in the profit of TPRs in other regions. In addition, at the beginning of introducing online channels, the recycling center can adopt two strategies to avoid conflicts among channels: keeping offline transfer prices unchanged and unifying all transfer prices, but the former promotes its economic profits more significantly.
机译:面对越来越严重的废物电气和电子设备(WEEE)回收问题,回收企业积极介绍在线回收渠道,建立双通道反向供应链(DRSC),并利用高级回收价格和服务水平来提高消费者的回收热情和回收金额。尽管如此,在中国,区域发展的失衡是广泛的,回收中心,第三方回收商(TPR)和第三方平台(TPP)面临着多区域消费者时的定价和服务水平的选择。本文主要回答以下问题:(1)当回收中心和TPP在多区域情况下介绍在线回收渠道时,它们应该如何在线回收价格,转让价格和服务水平? (2)当消费者偏好在线渠道发生在某个地区时,回收企业应该如何调整不同地区的最佳定价和服务水平决策,以最大限度地提高自己的利润?回收企业的利润如何变化?为了解决上述问题,在本文中,我们向在线渠道提出了三种定价和服务水平决策模型,即在线渠道,保持价格不变,统一所有价格,并最大限度地提高自己的利润。通过使用Stackelberg游戏来解决模型,我们获得最佳定价,服务级别决策,以及当消费者偏好变化时回收中心,TPP和TPR的最大利润。通过分析模型的结果,我们发现某个地区在线渠道的消费者偏好的变化将影响多区域回收企业的决策和利润。具体而言,某个地区的在线渠道的消费者偏好不仅会导致回收中心和TPP的利润增加,以及当地TPR的利润减少,也是在其他地区的TPRS利润增加。此外,在介绍在线渠道的开始时,回收中心可以采用两种策略来避免渠道之间的冲突:保持离线转移价格不变,统一所有转移价格,但前者更大地促进其经济利润。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号