首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >An mHealth Workplace-Based Sit Less Move More Program: Impact on Employees’ Sedentary and Physical Activity Patterns at Work and Away from Work
【2h】

An mHealth Workplace-Based Sit Less Move More Program: Impact on Employees’ Sedentary and Physical Activity Patterns at Work and Away from Work

机译:基于MHEATH工作场所的稍少移动更多计划:对员工的久坐不动和身体活动模式的影响以及远离工作

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Most workplace interventions that aim to reduce sedentary behaviour have 38 focused on employees’ sedentary patterns at-work but less have focused on understanding the 39 impact beyond working time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a 13-week m-40 health workplace-based ‘sit less, move more’ intervention (Walk@WorkApp; W@W-App) on 41 physical activity (PA) and sitting in desk-based employees at-work and away from work. Methods: Participants (n = 141) were assigned by hospital to an intervention group (IG; used the W@W-App; n = 90) or an active comparison group (A-CG; monitored occupational activity; n = 51). The W@W-App, installed on the participants´ own smartphones, provided real-time feedback for occupational sitting, standing, and stepping, and gave access to automated strategies to sit less and move more at work. Changes between groups were assessed for total sitting time, sedentary bouts and breaks, and light and moderate-to-vigorous PA (activPAL3TM; min/day) between the baseline and after program completion. Results: Compared to the A-CG, employees that used the W@W-App program increased their number of daily breaks and the time spent on short sedentary bouts (<20 min, p = 0.047) during weekends. Changes in shortest sedentary bouts (5–10 min) during weekends were also statistically significant (p < 0.05). No changes in workday PA or sitting were observed. Conclusion: Desk-based employees seemed to transfer the W@W-App program knowledge outside of work. Evaluating the impact of workplace (mHealth-based or not) interventions at work but also away from work would provide a better understating of the impact of such interventions.
机译:背景:旨在减少久坐行为的大多数工作场所干预措施都集中于员工的久坐不动模式,但尚未侧重于理解超出工作时间的39个影响。本研究的目的是评估13周M-40健康工作场所的“坐下的影响,在41体育活动(PA)和坐在上移动更多”干预(步行@ WATHEP; W-W-APP)在基于桌上的员工,工作和远离工作。方法:参与者(N = 141)由医院分配给干预组(Ig;使用W @ W-App; n = 90)或活动比较组(A-CG;被监测的职业活动; n = 51)。 W @ W-App安装在参与者自己的智能手机上,为职业坐姿,站立和踩踏提供了实时反馈,并获得了自动化策略的访问,以便在工作中稍得多。在基线和计划完成后,评估组之间的变化,久坐的时间,久坐的呼声和休息和破裂,光和中度至活跃的PA(Activepal3TM; Min / Day)。结果:与A-CG相比,使用W @ W-App程序的员工增加了他们的每日休息数量以及周末在短期久坐的时间(<20分钟,P = 0.047)上花费的时间。周末最短的久坐额度(5-10分钟)的变化也有统计学意义(P <0.05)。没有观察到工作日或坐的变化。结论:基于桌面的员工似乎在工作之外转移W @ W-App计划知识。评估工作场所(基于MHECHEATH-COMENT)干预在工作中的影响,但也会远离工作将更好地低估此类干预措施的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号