首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Searching for Evidence-Based Public Policy and Practice: Analysis of the Determinants of Personal/Public Adaptation and Mitigation Behavior against Particulate Matter by Focusing on the Roles of Risk Perception Communication and Attribution Factors
【2h】

Searching for Evidence-Based Public Policy and Practice: Analysis of the Determinants of Personal/Public Adaptation and Mitigation Behavior against Particulate Matter by Focusing on the Roles of Risk Perception Communication and Attribution Factors

机译:寻找基于循证的公共政策和实践:通过专注于风险认知沟通和归因因素的角色分析个人/公共适应和缓解颗粒物问题的决定因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In recent years, awareness about the risk of particulate matter (PM) has increased both domestically and internationally; consequently, various policies have been implemented to reduce PM. Since citizens are both victim and cause of this risk, PM cannot be successfully decreased only through government policies. Therefore, citizens’ active participation is required to reduce PM and prevent its risks. However, a theoretical model about public behavior against PM has not been established. Therefore, we suggest the public behavior model about individuals’ response against PM, in which response actions are classified into four types based on the combinations of the public-personal domains and mitigation-adaptation actions: Personal or public adaptations, and personal or public mitigations. We analyze how risk perception, risk communication, blame attribution factors influence the four types of responses against PM. The analysis results reveal that the receiver’s ability, negative emotion, trust in government, and age influence personal mitigation behavior, personal adaptation, public mitigation, and public adaptation, respectively. As this study demonstrates the differences in the factors influencing each type of response actions against PM, evidence-based policy is needed that considers the differences in these influencing factors.
机译:近年来,对颗粒物质(PM)风险的认识在国内和国际上增加了;因此,已经实施了各种政策以减少PM。由于公民是受害者和这种风险的原因,PM无法通过政府政策成功降低。因此,公民的积极参与需要减少下午并防止其风险。但是,尚未建立关于对PM的公共行积的理论模型。因此,我们建议根据公共个人领域的组合和缓解适应行动的组合分为四种类型的个人对PM的公共行为模型,其中响应行动被分为四种类型:个人或公共适应行动,以及个人或公共减轻。我们分析风险感知,风险沟通,责任归因因素如何影响对PM的四种响应。分析结果表明,接收者的能力,负面情绪,政府信任,年龄分别影响个人缓解行为,个人适应,公开缓解和公众适应。由于本研究表明,影响每种类型响应行动的因素的差异,需要考虑这些影响因素的差异的基于证据的政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号