首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Efficacy of a Multi-component m-Health Weight-loss Intervention in Overweight and Obese Adults: A Randomised Controlled Trial
【2h】

Efficacy of a Multi-component m-Health Weight-loss Intervention in Overweight and Obese Adults: A Randomised Controlled Trial

机译:多组分M健康减肥干预在超重和肥胖成年人中的功效:随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: This study compared the efficacy of two multi-component m-health interventions with a wait-list control group on body weight (primary outcome), and secondary outcomes of cardiovascular risk factors, lifestyle behaviours, and mental health. Methods: Three-arm randomised controlled trial (Enhanced: physical activity, diet, sleep, Traditional: physical activity, diet, Control) with assessments conducted at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Participants (n = 116) were overweight or obese adults aged 19–65 (M = 44.5 [SD = 10.5]). The 6-month intervention was delivered via a smartphone app providing educational materials, goal-setting, self-monitoring and feedback, and also included one face-to-face dietary consultation, a Fitbit and scales. The trial was prospectively registered and conducted between May 2017 and September 2018. Group differences on primary and secondary outcomes were examined between the Pooled Intervention groups (Pooled Intervention = Enhanced and Traditional) and Control groups, and then between Enhanced and Traditional groups. Results: Nineteen participants (16.4%) formally withdrew from the trial. Compared with the Control group, average body weight of the Pooled Intervention group did not differ at 6 (between-group difference = −0.92, (95% CI −3.33, 1.48)) or 12 months (0.00, (95% CI −2.62, 2.62)). Compared with the Control group, the Pooled Intervention group significantly increased resistance training (OR = 7.83, (95% CI 1.08, 56.63)) and reduced energy intake at 6 months (−1037.03, (−2028.84, −45.22)), and improved insomnia symptoms at 12 months (−2.59, (−4.79, −0.39)). Compared with the Traditional group, the Enhanced group had increased waist circumferences (2.69, (0.20, 5.18)) and sedentary time at 6 months (105.66, (30.83, 180.48)), and improved bed time variability at 12 months (−1.08, (−1.86, −0.29)). No other significant differences were observed between groups. Conclusions: Relative to Controls, the Pooled Intervention groups did not differ on body weight but improved resistance training, and reduced energy intake and insomnia symptom severity. No additional weight loss was apparent when targeting improvements in physical activity, diet and sleep in combination compared with physical activity and diet.
机译:背景:本研究比较了两种多组分M健康干预措施与等级对照组对体重(主要结果)的影响,以及心血管危险因素,生活方式行为和心理健康的二次结果。方法:三臂随机对照试验(增强:身体活动,饮食,睡眠,传统:体育活动,饮食,控制),评估在基线,6和12个月。参与者(n = 116)的超重或肥胖的成年人19-65岁(m = 44.5 [sd = 10.5])。通过智能手机应用程序提供6个月的干预,提供教育材料,目标设置,自我监控和反馈,并包括一个面对面的饮食咨询,一个Fitbit和秤。该审判在2017年5月至2018年5月期间进行了预期和进行。在汇总干预组(汇总干预=增强和传统)和对照组之间,在汇总和传统群体之间审查了对初级和二次结果的小组差异。结果:19名参与者(16.4%)正式退出试验。与对照组相比,汇总干预组的平均体重在6(组差异= -1.0.92之间,(95%CI-33,1.48))或12个月(0.00,(95%CI -2.62 ,2.62))。与对照组相比,汇集干预组显着增加了阻力训练(或= 7.83,(95%CI 1.08,56.63)),并在6个月内降低了能量摄入量(-1037.03,(-2028.84,-45.22),并改善了12个月的失眠症症状(-2.59,(-4.79,-0.39))。与传统组相比,增强型组增加了腰周围增加(2.69,(0.20,5.18))和6个月的久坐时间(105.66,(30.83,180.48)),12个月内改善床时间变异性(-1.08, (-1.86,-0.29)))。在组之间没有观察到其他显着差异。结论:相对于对照,汇集干预组对体重没有差异,但抗性训练改善,减少能量摄入量和失眠症症状严重程度。与身体活动和饮食相比,当靶向体育活动,饮食和睡眠的改善时,没有额外的减肥是显而易见的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号