首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Innovation in Aging >Socioeconomic Inequality in Long-Term Care: A Comparison of Three Time Periods in the Netherlands
【2h】

Socioeconomic Inequality in Long-Term Care: A Comparison of Three Time Periods in the Netherlands

机译:长期护理中的社会经济不平等:荷兰三个时间段的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study aims at investigating to what extent inequalities in the use of formal, informal and privately paid care have changed over time. Data from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) was used from three points in time (1995, 2005 and 2015) that capture distinct periods in the recent development of the Dutch long-term care system. In particular, the reforms of 2007 and 2015 might have impacted care uses. All participants (N = 1810) were living at home and between the age of 75 and 85 at measurement. The results indicate that, adjusted for health and partner status, formal, informal and privately paid care have decreased over time. Socioeconomic differences in informal care use have increased over time, but no change was found for privately paid or formal care use. These findings suggest that changes in the LTC system and long-term care resources in particular benefit lower socioeconomic groups.
机译:本研究旨在调查使用正式,非正式和私人经费的使用程度随着时间的推移而变化。来自纵向老化研究的数据来自Amsterdam(LASA)从三个时间点(1995,2005和2015)中使用,在荷兰长期护理系统最近的发展中捕获了独特的时期。特别是,2007年和2015年的改革可能会影响护理用途。所有参与者(n = 1810)都在家里和75和85岁之间居住在测量。结果表明,为健康和合作伙伴状况调整,正式,非正式和私人经费随着时间的推移而减少。非正式护理用途的社会经济差异随着时间的推移而增加,但没有发现私人支付或正式护理的变化。这些调查结果表明,LTC系统的变化和长期护理资源特别有益于较低的社会经济群体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号