首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Brain Sciences >Sentence Recall in Latent and Anomic Aphasia: An Exploratory Study of Semantics and Syntax
【2h】

Sentence Recall in Latent and Anomic Aphasia: An Exploratory Study of Semantics and Syntax

机译:句子回忆在潜在和异常的开性腺:语义和语法的探索性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We investigated whether semantic plausibility and syntactic complexity affect immediate sentence recall in people with latent and anomic aphasia. To date, these factors have not been explored in these types of aphasia. As with previous studies of sentence recall, we measured accuracy of verbatim recall and uniquely real-time speech measures. The results showed that accuracy did not distinguish performance between latent aphasia and neurotypical controls. However, some of the real-time speech measures distinguished performance between people with latent aphasia and neurotypical controls. There was some evidence, though not pervasive, that semantic plausibility and syntactic complexity influenced recall performance. There were no interactions between semantic plausibility and syntactic complexity. The speed of preparation of responses was slower in latent aphasia than controls; it was also slower in anomic aphasia than both latent and control groups. It appears that processing speed as indexed by temporal speech measures may be differentially compromised in latent and anomic aphasia. However, semantic plausibility and syntactic complexity did not show clear patterns of performance among the groups. Notwithstanding the absence of interactions, we advance an explanation based on conceptual short-term memory as to why semantically implausible sentences are typically more erroneous and possibly also slower in recall.
机译:我们调查了语义合理性和句法复杂性是否影响了潜在和异常的失语的人的直接句子召回。迄今为止,这些因素尚未在这些类型的性腺中探讨。与对句子召回的先前研究一样,我们测量了逐字召回和独特的实时语音措施的准确性。结果表明,准确性没有区分潜在的性腺和神经典型控制之间的性能。然而,一些实时言论衡量潜在的失语症和神经典型对照之间的人们之间的杰出性能。有一些证据虽然没有普遍存在,但语义合理性和句法复杂性影响了召回表现。语义合理性与句法复杂性之间没有相互作用。潜伏的反应的制备速度比对照较慢;在异常性厌氧病中也比潜在和对照组更慢。似乎由时间语音测量索引的处理速度可能在潜伏和异常的失语中差异地受到差异。然而,语义合理性和句法复杂性没有显示群体中的明确表现模式。尽管没有互动,但我们基于概念性短期记忆的解释,为什么语义令人难以判断的句子通常更为错误,并且可能在召回时也可能更慢。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号