首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Immunology >Comparison of the efficacy of Tegatard and Tegretol as a monotherapy in patients with focal seizure with or without secondary generalization
【2h】

Comparison of the efficacy of Tegatard and Tegretol as a monotherapy in patients with focal seizure with or without secondary generalization

机译:TegAtard和Tegretol作为焦点癫痫发作患者的单疗法的比较或没有二次泛化的疗效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Carbamazepine is a first line treatment for focal epilepsy. Tegretol and Tegatard are two trade name of Carbamazepine. Tegretol is produced by Novartis Pharmaceutical Company, Switzerland. Recently, Raha pharmaceutical Company in Iran has produced CBZ which trade named is Tegatard. Extended usage of Tegatard instead of Tegretol has economic benefits for Iranian families. In this clinical trial, we aimed to compare therapeutic efficacy and safety of Tegretol and Tegatard in patients suffering from focal seizures with or without secondary generalization. Methods: 200 patients with provoked or non-provoked focal seizure with or without secondary generalization were screened and 180 patients were fulfilled the criteria to enter this double blinded clinical trial study. Patients were divided into two groups, the first group (A) received Tegretol and the second group (B) Tegatard. Carbamazepine (CBZ) was prescribed with doses 10-20 mg/kg every 12 hours by neurologists. The patients were visited after 1, 3 and 6 months and the side effects and lab data in patients were investigated. Results: Patients were divided into two groups, 88 patients in group A (Tegretol) (50 males and 38 females) and 92 in group B (Tegatard) (51 males and 41 females). Mean age of patients was 35.39±11.17 years. There was no significant difference according to age and gender, Carbamazepine dosage, EEG recording, neuroimaging change and adverse effects of antiepileptic drug between two groups (P>0.05). Regarding the drug efficacy, in group A and B, 60 (68%) and 58 (63%) patients were seizure free after 6 month follow up; respectively. The differences between two groups were not statistically significant (P value =0.46). Conclusion: Tegatard is an effective drug with similar efficacy, similar side effects and cost-effectiveness compared with Tegretol and could be used widely when indicated.
机译:背景:Carbamazepine是局灶性癫痫的第一线治疗。 Tegretol和Tegatard是尸毒胺的两名商品名。 Tegretol是由瑞士诺华制药公司生产的。最近,伊朗的Raha制药公司制作了CBZ,该贸易命名为Tegatard。 Tegatard的扩展用法代替Tegretol对伊朗家庭具有经济利益。在该临床试验中,我们旨在比较Tegretol和Tegatard的治疗效果和安全性,在患有或没有二次泛化的焦点癫痫发作。方法:筛查200例挑起或未引发的局灶性癫痫发作的患者,筛查了180名患者进入这种双盲临床试验研究的标准。患者分为两组,第一组(A)接受Tegretol和第二组(B)Tegatard。通过神经泌虫每12小时用剂量10-20mg / kg规定carbamazepine(cbz)。在1,3和6个月后访问患者,并研究了患者的副作用和实验室数据。结果:患者分为两组,A(Tegatard)(Tegatard)(51名男性和41名女性)的A(Tegretol)(50名男性和38名女性)和92名患者。患者的平均年龄为35.39±11.17岁。根据年龄和性别,卡巴西豆剂量,脑电图,抗癫痫药物在两组之间的抗癫痫药物的不良反应没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。关于药物疗效,在6个月后,A组和B组,60(68%)和58例(63%)和58名(63%)患者被扣押;分别。两组之间的差异在统计学上没有显着(P值= 0.46)。结论:TEGATARD是一种有效的药物,与TEGRELOL相比,与TEGRELOL相比具有相似的疗效,类似的副作用和成本效益,并且可以在指出时广泛使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号