首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education >Comparing Active Learning to Team-Based Learning in Undergraduate Neuroscience
【2h】

Comparing Active Learning to Team-Based Learning in Undergraduate Neuroscience

机译:比较主动学习对本科神经科学的基于团队学习

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Team-based learning (TBL) is a special form of collaborative learning that involves the use of permanent working teams throughout the semester. In this highly structured and interactive teaching method, students perform preparatory activities outside of class to gain factual knowledge and understand basic concepts. In class, students collaborate with peers to apply content, analyze findings, and synthesize new ideas. To better understand the learning outcomes specific to TBL courses, we analyzed end-of-semester course evaluations from an undergraduate neuroscience course taught using either a moderate structure active learning or TBL format. Our analysis reveals that the TBL taught classes had significantly higher levels of self-reported learning in the areas of gaining, understanding, and synthesizing knowledge. We propose that these gains are driven by the TBL readiness assurance process and peer evaluations. Both of these structural components are expected to increase student accountability, motivation, and engagement with course content.
机译:基于团队的学习(TBL)是一种特殊的协作学习形式,涉及在整个学期中使用永久性工作团队。在这种高度结构化和互动的教学方法中,学生在课外进行筹备活动,以获得事实知识和理解基本概念。在课堂上,学生与同行合作,申请内容,分析调查结果和综合新想法。为了更好地了解特定于TBL课程的学习结果,我们通过中等结构主动学习或TBL格式分析了从本科神经科学课程的学期课程评估。我们的分析表明,在获得知识,理解和综合知识的领域,TBL教学课程在获得的领域具有明显更高的自我报告学习。我们建议这些收益是由TBL准备保障过程和同行评估驱动的。这两个结构部件都预计会增加学生问责制,动机和与课程内容的参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号