首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>EFSA Journal >Update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 11: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2019
【2h】

Update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 11: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2019

机译:更新有意添加到食品或饲料中的QP推荐的生物制剂列表以EFSA 11通知:分类单位向EFSA通知的分类单位直到2019年9月

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Qualified presumption of safety ( ) was developed to provide a generic safety evaluation for biological agents to support 's Scientific Panels. The taxonomic identity, body of knowledge, safety concerns and antimicrobial resistance are assessed. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit ( ) are where possible to be confirmed at strain or product level, reflected by ‘qualifications’. No new information was found that would change the previously recommended s and their qualifications. The list of microorganisms notified to was updated with 54 biological agents, received between April and September 2019; 23 already had status, 14 were excluded from the exercise (7 filamentous fungi, 6 , which was already evaluated). Seventeen, corresponding to 16 s, were evaluated for possible status, fourteen of these for the first time, and , evaluated previously, was excluded because it is not a valid species. Eight s are recommended for status. and are recommended to be included in the list. and can be recommended for the list with the qualification ‘for production purposes only’ and absence of toxigenic potential. can be recommended for the list with the qualification ‘absence of toxigenic potential and the absence of aminoglycoside production ability’. and can be recommended for the list with the qualification ‘production purposes only’. is not recommended for the list due to lack of body of knowledge in relation to its pathogenicity potential for plants. , and cannot be recommended for the list due to lack of body of knowledge. cannot be recommended for the list due to safety concerns.
机译:制定了安全的安全推定(),为支持科学板的生物制剂提供通用的安全评估。评估分类,知识体,知识体,安全问题和抗微生物抗性。对分类单位()鉴定的安全问题是在可能的“资质”的菌株或产品水平上可以确认。没有发现任何新信息,可以改变先前推荐的s及其资格。通知的微生物清单已在2019年4月至9月期间收到的54名生物学代理商更新; 23已经存在状态,14人被排除在运动之外(7个丝状真菌,6,已经评估)。对应于16秒的十七个,评估可能的状态,第一次第一次,并且先前评估,因为它不是有效的物种而被排除在外。建议八个s的状态。并建议包含在列表中。并且可以推荐用于符合资格的列表“仅用于生产目的”并没有毒性潜力。可以建议列出符合资格“没有毒性潜力和缺乏氨基糖苷类生产能力”的清单。并可以为列表建议,具有资格的生产目的'。由于其植物致病性潜力而缺乏知识缺乏知识,不推荐该清单。 ,由于缺乏知识体系,不能推荐列表。由于安全问题,不能推荐列表。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号