首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Anatomy Cell Biology >Infusing the axioms of clinical reasoning while designing clinical anatomy case vignettes teaching for novice medical students: a randomised cross over study
【2h】

Infusing the axioms of clinical reasoning while designing clinical anatomy case vignettes teaching for novice medical students: a randomised cross over study

机译:在设计临床解剖案例的同时为临床医学生的教学注入临床推理公理:随机交叉研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The clinical reasoning skills is often gained when the biomedical knowledge is broadened and deepened alongside exposure to patients. The ‘ideal’ blend of axioms of clinical reasoning and case based learning would establish the pedagogical bridges right from the first year of medical education. So this study aimed to investigate the perceived importance and efficacy of teaching clinical reasoning skills among first year medical students, as this has not previously been described. As a priori, two clinical reasoning skill sessions were conducted using clinico-anatomical case vignettes designed according to the literature regarding clinical reasoning (‘serial cue’ approach and hypothetico-deduction). Students were divided into intervention and control group and crossed over in subsequent sessions. Analysis was done by mixed method approach including measuring proof of benefit using post-test comparison, quantitative survey and qualitative analysis by nominal group discussion. Post test scores were compared using student’s -test. Feedbacks were analysed using descriptive statistics. The results showed that post test scores were significantly higher in intervention group than the control group in both sessions ( <0.001, 0.016). A total of 66% students felt, diagnostic skills and lateral thinking abilities were improved and It helped in developing problem-solving abilities for 67% students. clinico-anatomical case vignettes helped in understanding anatomical basis of clinical conditions for 61% students. To conclude, introducing clinical reasoning has considerable effect in improving the decision making ability of the students and if incorporated right from the first year, would better prepare the students in successful transition to clinical learning environment.
机译:当生物医学知识随着接触患者而扩大和加深时,通常会获得临床推理技能。从医学教育的第一年起,临床推理和案例学习的“理想”融合就可以建立教学的桥梁。因此,本研究旨在调查医学一年级学生中教授临床推理技能的重要性和有效性,因为以前没有对此进行过描述。作为先验,使用了根据有关临床推理的文献(“序列提示”方法和假设推论)设计的临床解剖病例短片,进行了两次临床推理技能培训。将学生分为干预组和对照组,并在随后的课程中进行交叉讨论。通过混合方法进行分析,包括使用测试后比较来衡量收益的证明,定量调查以及通过名义小组讨论进行定性分析。测试后的分数使用学生的测试进行比较。使用描述性统计数据对反馈进行了分析。结果表明,干预组的测试后评分在两个疗程中均显着高于对照组(<0.001,0.016)。共有66%的学生感到,诊断技能和横向思考能力得到了提高,并帮助67%的学生发展了解决问题的能力。临床解剖案例小插图有助于了解61%学生的临床状况的解剖基础。总而言之,引入临床推理对提高学生的决策能力具有相当大的作用,如果从第一年开始就加入,将更好地为学生做好成功过渡到临床学习环境的准备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号