【2h】

Should Contact Bans Have Been Lifted More in Germany?

机译:德国应否进一步取消接触禁令?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Many countries consider the lifting of restrictions of social contacts (RSC). We quantify the effects of RSC for Germany. We initially employ a purely statistical approach to predicting prevalence of Covid-19 if RSC had been upheld after 20 April. We employ these findings and feed them into our theoretical model. We find that the peak of the number of sick individuals would have been reached already end of April. The number of sick individuals would have fallen below 1000 at the beginning of July. If restrictions had been lifted completely on April 20, the number of sick should have risen quickly again from around 27 April. A balance between economic and individual costs of RSC and public health objectives consists in lifting RSC for activities that have high economic benefits but low health costs. In the absence of large-scale representative testing of CoV-2 infections, these activities can most easily be identified if federal states of Germany adopted exit strategies that across states.
机译:许多国家考虑取消对社会交往的限制。我们量化了RSC对德国的影响。如果RSC在4月20日之后得到支持,我们最初将采用纯统计方法来预测Covid-19的患病率。我们运用这些发现并将其输入到我们的理论模型中。我们发现,生病人数的高峰已经在四月底达到。到7月初,患病人数将降至1000以下。如果4月20日完全取消限制,那么生病的人数应该从4月27日左右开始迅速增加。 RSC的经济和个人成本与公共卫生目标之间的平衡在于,取消具有较高经济效益但卫生成本较低的活动的RSC。在没有大规模代表性的CoV-2感染检测的情况下,如果德国联邦州采用跨州退出策略,则最容易确定这些活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号