首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Psychiatry Psychology and Law >Assessing the Risk of Australian Indigenous Sexual Offenders Reoffending: AReview of the Research Literature and Court Decisions
【2h】

Assessing the Risk of Australian Indigenous Sexual Offenders Reoffending: AReview of the Research Literature and Court Decisions

机译:评估澳大利亚土著性罪犯再次犯罪的风险:A审查研究文献和法院判决

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The assessment of offenders’ risk of reoffending, particularly sexual reoffending, is acore activity of forensic mental health practitioners. The purpose of these assessments isto reduce the risk of harm to the public, but they are controversial and become morecontentious when Australian practitioners who want to undertake such assessments in anethically responsible way must use reliable validated instruments, disclose thelimitations of their assessment methods, instruments and data to judicial decision-makersand understand how decision-makers might use their reports. The purpose of this systematicliterature review was to explore the practices of Australian practitioners and courts inrespect of the assessment of Australian Indigenous male sexual offenders’ risk ofreoffending. We could not identify an instrument that has been developed for theassessment of this population group. Australian courts differ in whether they admit andgive weight to practitioners’ evidence and opinions based on data obtained withnon-validated instruments. We could only identify three possible predictor variables withenough quantitative support to justify including them in an instrument that could be usedto assess Indigenous sexual offenders. There is a need for research regarding the validityof the instruments that practitioners use.
机译:对罪犯再次犯罪的风险的评估,特别是对性犯罪的评估,法医精神卫生从业人员的核心活动。这些评估的目的是减少伤害公众的风险,但是它们是有争议的,并且变得更加想要在澳大利亚进行此类评估的澳大利亚从业人员有争议道德负责的方式必须使用可靠的经过验证的工具,他们的评估方法,手段和数据对司法决策者的局限性并了解决策者如何使用他们的报告。这个系统的目的文献综述旨在探讨澳大利亚从业人员和法院的实践。评估澳大利亚土著男性性罪犯的患病风险重新冒犯。我们无法确定已针对对这一人群的评估。澳大利亚法院是否承认和根据从中获得的数据,强调从业人员的证据和意见未经验证的工具。我们只能确定三个可能的预测变量足够的定量支持以证明将它们包括在可以使用的工具中评估土著性犯罪者。需要研究有效性从业者使用的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号