首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Human Brain Mapping >Flexibility in embodied lexical‐semantic representations
【2h】

Flexibility in embodied lexical‐semantic representations

机译:体现的词汇语义表达的灵活性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

According to an embodied view of language comprehension, language concepts are grounded in our perceptual systems. Evidence for the idea that concepts are grounded in areas involved in action and perception comes from both behavioral and neuroimaging studies (Glenberg [1997]: Behav Brain Sci 20:1‐55; Barsalou [1999]: Behav Brain Sci 22:577‐660; Pulvermueller [1999]: Behav Brain Sci 22:253‐336; Barsalou et al. [2003]: Trends Cogn Sci 7:84‐91). However, the results from several studies indicate that the activation of information in perception and action areas is not a purely automatic process (Raposo et al. [2009]: Neuropsychologia 47:388‐396; Rueschemeyer et al. [2007]: J Cogn Neurosci 19:855‐865). These findings suggest that embodied representations are flexible. In these studies, flexibility is characterized by the relative presence or absence of activation in our perceptual systems. However, even if the context in which a word is presented does not undermine a motor interpretation, it is possible that the degree to which a modality‐specific region contributes to a representation depends on the context in which conceptual features are retrieved. In the present study, we investigated this issue by presenting word stimuli for which both motor and visual properties (e.g., Tennis ball, Boxing glove) were important in constituting the concept. Conform with the idea that language representations are flexible and context dependent, we demonstrate that the degree to which a modality‐specific region contributes to a representation considerably changes as a function of context. Hum Brain Mapp 33:2322–2333, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:根据语言理解的具体观点,语言概念是建立在我们的感知系统中的。行为和神经影像研究都证实了概念扎根于涉及动作和感知的领域这一观点的证据(Glenberg [1997]:Behav Brain Sci 20:1-55; Barsalou [1999]:Behav Brain Sci 22:577-660 ; Pulvermueller [1999]:Behav Brain Sci 22:253-336; Barsalou等人[2003]:Trends Cogn Sci 7:84-91)。但是,一些研究的结果表明,感知和行动领域中信息的激活不是一个纯粹的自动过程(Raposo等人[2009]:Neuropsychologia 47:388-396; Rueschemeyer等人[2007]:J Cogn神经科学19:855-865)。这些发现表明具体体现是灵活的。在这些研究中,灵活性的特征是我们的感知系统中激活的相对存在或不存在。但是,即使出现单词的上下文不会破坏运动解释,但特定于情态的区域对表示的贡献程度也可能取决于检索概念特征的上下文。在本研究中,我们通过提出单词刺激来研究此问题,对于单词刺激而言,运动和视觉特性(例如网球,拳击手套)在构成该概念中都非常重要。符合语言表示形式灵活且依赖于上下文的想法,我们证明了特定于情态的区域对表示的贡献程度随上下文而变化。嗡嗡声大脑地图33:2322–2333,2012。©2011 Wiley Periodicals,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号