首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Health Policy and Management >Aging Pensions and Long-term Care: What Why Who How?
【2h】

Aging Pensions and Long-term Care: What Why Who How?

机译:老龄化养老金和长期照护:什么为什么谁如何?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Japan has been aging faster than other industrialized nations, and its experience offers useful lessons to others. Japan has been willing to expand its welfare state with a long-term care (LTC) insurance to finance home care and nursing home care for frail elderly. As Ikegami shows, it created new facilities and expanded specialized staffing for home care, developed a country-wide assessment system and shifted responsibilities between the central and local authorities over that assessment and the determination of co-payments for LTC. Faced with rapid growth in demand for LTC, the government felt the need for new cost control measures. The Japanese experience illustrates that new social policies take time to develop. There is often a need to adjust. But there are also other lessons. The main one is that there is no direct relation between the degree of population aging and total health spending. While aging requires adjustments in the organization of care, and expanding LTC for frail elderly, international studies show there is no need to worry about the ‘unaffordability’ of aging. In this commentary, we have framed four "What, Why, Who, and How" questions about LTC to (re-)define the borderlines between public and private responsibilities for the range of activities for which some (but certainly not all) frail elderly as well as many non-elderly require support in daily life.
机译:日本比其他工业化国家老化得更快,它的经验为其他国家提供了有益的教训。日本一直愿意通过提供长期护理(LTC)保险来扩大其福利国家,以资助脆弱的老年人的家庭护理和养老院护理。如池上所示,它建立了新的设施并增加了家庭护理的专门人员,开发了一个全国范围的评估系统,并在中央和地方当局之间转移了对评估和LTC共同付款确定的责任。面对LTC需求的快速增长,政府感到有必要采取新的成本控制措施。日本的经验表明,制定新的社会政策需要时间。通常需要进行调整。但是,还有其他教训。主要的问题是人口老龄化程度与医疗总支出之间没有直接关系。衰老需要调整医疗机构,并为体弱的老年人扩展LTC,但国际研究表明,无需担心衰老的“负担能力”。在此评论中,我们提出了有关LTC的四个“什么,为什么,谁和如何”问题,以(重新)定义一些(但不是全部)衰弱的老年人所从事的一系列活动的公共和私人责任之间的界限。以及许多非老年人在日常生活中需要支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号