首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Surgery Journal >Work-Based Assessments in Higher General Surgical Training Program: A Mixed Methods Study Exploring Trainers and Trainees Views and Experiences
【2h】

Work-Based Assessments in Higher General Surgical Training Program: A Mixed Methods Study Exploring Trainers and Trainees Views and Experiences

机译:普通外科高级培训课程中的基于工作的评估:混合方法研究探索培训者和受训者的观点和经验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the United Kingdom, work-based assessments (WBAs) including procedure-based assessments (PBAs), case-based discussions (CBDs), clinical evaluation exercises (CEXs), and direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) have been used in Higher General Surgical Training Program (HGSTP) since the introduction of Modernising Medical Careers. Although the Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Project states that they should be used for the formative development of trainees using feedback and reflection, there is no study to look at the perception of their usefulness and barriers in using them, particularly in HGSTP. The aim of this study is to investigate trainer's and trainee's perception of their usefulness, barriers in using them, and way forward for their improvement in HGSTP.
机译:在英国,高等学校使用基于工作的评估(WBA),包括基于过程的评估(PBA),基于案例的讨论(CBD),临床评估练习(CEX)和对程序技能的直接观察(DOPS)。自引入现代化医疗职业以来的一般外科手术培训计划(HGSTP)。尽管大学间外科课程计划指出应通过反馈和反思将其用于受训者的形成性发展,但尚无研究考察其对他们的用处和障碍的认识,尤其是在HGSTP中。这项研究的目的是调查培训师和受训者对他们的有用性的认识,使用它们的障碍以及改善他们在HGSTP中的前进道路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号