首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrients >Evaluation of a Technological Image-Based Dietary Assessment Tool for Children during Pubertal Growth: A Pilot Study
【2h】

Evaluation of a Technological Image-Based Dietary Assessment Tool for Children during Pubertal Growth: A Pilot Study

机译:基于技术图像的青春期儿童饮食评估工具的评估:一项初步研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We designed an image-based dietary assessment tool called COFIT, which means “fit together” and pilot-tested it in the Taipei Puberty Longitudinal Study (TPLS). Children aged 6–17 years were invited to use COFIT over three days for recording all instances of eating in addition to maintaining written food records (FR). Spearman’s correlation and Bland–Altman analysis were used to compare the intake of macronutrients and micronutrients estimated using the image-based dietary assessment and the FR method. Intra-class correlation coefficients were used to estimate reliability between dietitians. In the final analysis, 23 children (mean age: 10.47 ± 0.47 years) with complete data obtained using two dietary assessment methods were included. Reliability among dietitians was high. Most assessments of macronutrients and micronutrients revealed moderate correlations between the two methods (range: 0.27–0.94); moreover, no significant differences in nutrients assessments were observed between the two methods, except for energy and fat. The average difference in energy intake between the methods was 194 kcal/day. Most limits of agreement were within an acceptable range. The Bland–Altman plots showed robust agreement with minimum bias. The limitation was the small sample size and not dividing the population into children and teenagers since the two groups may have different food consumption habits. Overall, the results showed that the image-based assessment tool is suitable for assessing children’s dietary intake of macronutrients and micronutrients during pubertal growth.
机译:我们设计了一种基于图像的膳食评估工具,称为COFIT,其意思是“合体”,并在台北青春期纵向研究(TPLS)中进行了先导测试。邀请6-17岁的儿童在三天内使用COFIT记录所有进食情况,并保留书面食物记录(FR)。使用Spearman的相关性和Bland–Altman分析来比较使用基于图像的饮食评估和FR方法估算的大量营养素和微量营养素的摄入量。类内相关系数用于估计营养师之间的可靠性。归根结底,纳入了采用两种饮食评估方法获得完整数据的23名儿童(平均年龄:10.47±0.47岁)。营养师之间的可靠性很高。大多数对大量营养素和微量营养素的评估表明,两种方法之间存在适度的相关性(范围:0.27–0.94);此外,除能量和脂肪外,这两种方法在营养评估上没有发现显着差异。两种方法之间能量摄入的平均差异为194 kcal /天。大多数协议限制都在可接受的范围内。 Bland-Altman图显示了最小偏差的稳健一致性。局限性在于样本量小,并且没有将人口分为儿童和青少年,因为两组可能有不同的饮食习惯。总体而言,结果表明,基于图像的评估工具适用于评估儿童青春期生长过程中饮食中大量营养素和微量营养素的摄入量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号