首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medicina Oral Patologa Oral y Ciruga Bucal >Letter to Editor: The smokeless tobacco habit and DNA damage: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Letter to Editor: The smokeless tobacco habit and DNA damage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:致编辑的信:无烟烟草习性和DNA损害:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

De Geus . ( ) carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of the results obtained in the studies on DNA damage induced in oral (buccal) cells of smokeless tobacco users. The authors mentioned that “most of the recent studies have shown that the frequency of micronucleus (MN) is significantly higher in chewing tobacco [better to write “in tobacco chewers”] and snuff users than in non-users, but there is still a controversy in the literature”. The first part is completely true but the second one not at all. Indeed, the authors cited 3 papers which (in their opinion) reflect “controversy in the literature” (refs. 16 – 18). But two of them reported about positive results (increased MN levels in buccal cells of users) and only one (ref. 17) presented negative findings in buccal cells of 'maras' powder users but significant increase of MN frequencies (1.44-fold; < 0.01) in exfoliated inner lip cells. It is important to mention that “maras” powder (one portion is 0.5 – 1.0 g) is applied to the lower lip mucosa and has no direct contact with buccal cells.
机译:德格斯(De Geus)。 ()对无烟烟草使用者口腔(颊)细胞中引起的DNA损伤的研究进行了系统的综述和荟萃分析。作者提到:“最近的大多数研究表明,咀嚼烟草和鼻烟使用者的微核(MN)频率明显高于非使用者,但仍然存在文学上的争议”。第一部分是完全正确的,但第二部分则完全没有。实际上,作者引用了3篇论文(他们认为)反映了“文学中的争议”(参考文献16-18)。但是其中有两个报告了积极的结果(使用者颊细胞中的MN水平升高),只有一个(参考文献17)在“马拉斯”粉使用者的颊细胞中呈阴性结果,但MN频率显着增加(1.44倍; < 0.01)在脱落的内唇细胞中。值得一提的是,“ maras”粉(一份为0.5 – 1.0 g)涂在下唇粘膜上,与颊细胞没有直接接触。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号