【2h】

Book Review

机译:书评

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As the United Kingdom faces an era of NHS staff shortages in the fallout from the Brexit vote and clampdowns on immigration, Douglas Haynes’ volume on the regulation of overseas practitioners offers a timely reminder that Britain has long pitted its medical needs against its protectionist instincts. Covering the period between 1850 and 1980, examines the global influence of British medicine by charting the thorny negotiations that allowed British practitioners to work abroad, and their overseas counterparts to train in Britain. This sprawling topic is made manageable by a focus on the actions of the General Council of Medical Education and Registration of the United Kingdom (GMC). While the GMC was a neutral organisation charged with ‘protecting the public’ by maintaining a register of licensed practitioners, this task was often burdened by political expectations and professional pressures. As a result, Haynes shows how the GMC acted as a gatekeeper to ‘British medicine’ by preserving its largely white, male character – even when selectively permitting foreign and female doctors to cross the threshold.
机译:由于英国面临着一个由英国脱欧公投产生的后果,以及对移民实行限制的NHS人员短缺的时代,道格拉斯·海恩斯(Douglas Haynes)对海外从业人员进行监管的数量及时提醒我们,英国长期以来一直将医疗需求与贸易保护主义本能相提并论。涵盖了1850年至1980年这段时期,它通过绘制棘手的谈判来考察英国医学在全球的影响力,使英国从业人员可以在国外工作,而海外同行则可以在英国接受培训。通过关注英国医学教育和注册总理事会(GMC)的行动,可以使这一庞大的主题变得易于管理。尽管GMC是一个中立的组织,负责通过保持执业执业者的登记来“保护公众”,但这项任务通常受到政治期望和专业压力的影响。结果,海恩斯(Haynes)展示了GMC如何通过保留大部分白人,男性特征来充当“英国医学”的看门人-即使选择性地允许外国和女性医生越过门槛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号