首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >External Quality Assessment for Enterovirus 71 and Coxsackievirus A16 Detection by Reverse Transcription-PCR Using Armored RNA as a Virus Surrogate
【2h】

External Quality Assessment for Enterovirus 71 and Coxsackievirus A16 Detection by Reverse Transcription-PCR Using Armored RNA as a Virus Surrogate

机译:肠病毒71和柯萨奇病毒A16检测的外部质量评估使用装甲RNA作为病毒替代品的逆转录PCR

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Three armored RNAs (virus-like particles [VLPs]) containing target sequences from enterovirus 71 (EV71) and coxsackievirus A16 (CA16) and a pan-enterovirus (pan-EV) sequence were constructed and used in an external quality assessment (EQA) to determine the performance of laboratories in the detection of EV71 and CA16. The EQA panel, which consisted of 20 samples, including 14 positive samples with different concentrations of EV and either EV71 or CA16 armored RNAs, 2 samples with all 3 armored RNAs, and 4 negative-control samples (NaN3-preserved minimal essential medium [MEM] without VLPs), was distributed to 54 laboratories that perform molecular diagnosis of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) virus infections. A total of 41 data sets from 41 participants were returned; 5 (12.2%) were generated using conventional in-house reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays, and 36 (87.8%) were generated using commercial real-time RT-PCR assays. Performance assessments of laboratories differed; 12 (29.3%) showed a need for improvement. Surprisingly, 4 laboratories were unable to detect EV71 RNA in any samples, even those containing the highest concentration of 107 IU/ml. Furthermore, the detection sensitivity for EV71 among all laboratories (82.1%) was substantially lower than that for EV (97.4%) or CA16 (95.1%). Overall, the results of the present study indicate that EQA should be performed periodically to help laboratories monitor their ability to detect HFMD viruses and to improve the comparability of results from different laboratories.
机译:构建了三个包含肠道病毒71(EV71)和柯萨奇病毒A16(CA16)和泛肠病毒(pan-EV)序列的靶序列的装甲RNA(病毒样颗粒[VLP]),并将其用于外部质量评估(EQA)以确定实验室在检测EV71和CA16方面的性能。 EQA小组由20个样品组成,包括14个带有不同浓度的EV和EV71或CA16铠装RNA的阳性样品,2个带有所有3个铠装RNA的样品和4个阴性对照样品(保留NaN3的基本必需培养基[MEM ](不含VLP))分发给了54个进行手足口病(HFMD)病毒感染分子诊断的实验室。共返回了来自41个参与者的41个数据集;使用常规的内部逆转录PCR(RT-PCR)分析产生了5(12.2%),使用商业实时RT-PCR分析产生了36(87.8%)。实验室的绩效评估有所不同; 12(29.3%)显示有待改善。令人惊讶的是,有4个实验室无法检测到任何样品中的EV71 RNA,即使这些样品的最高浓度为10 7 IU / ml。此外,在所有实验室中对EV71的检测灵敏度(82.1%)大大低于对EV(97.4%)或CA16(95.1%)的检测灵敏度。总体而言,本研究的结果表明应定期进行EQA,以帮助实验室监测其检测HFMD病毒的能力并提高不同实验室的结果的可比性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号