首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Laxer Clinical Criteria for Gaming Disorder May Hinder Future Efforts to Devise an Efficient Diagnostic Approach: A Tree-Based Model Study
【2h】

Laxer Clinical Criteria for Gaming Disorder May Hinder Future Efforts to Devise an Efficient Diagnostic Approach: A Tree-Based Model Study

机译:针对游戏障碍的Laxer临床标准可能会阻碍未来设计有效诊断方法的努力:基于树的模型研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) has been recognized in May 2013 and can be evaluated using the criteria developed by American Psychiatric Association (APA). The present study investigated the role each IGD criteria plays in diagnosing disordered gaming. A total of 3377 participants (mean age 20 years, = 4.3 years) participated in the study. The data collected was scrutinized to detect patterns of IGD using Conditional Inference Tree (Ctree), a sophisticated machine algorithm. Participants provided basic sociodemographic information and completed the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale–Short-Form (IGDS9-SF). The results identified classes of IGD-related symptoms, indicating that endorsing ‘withdrawal’ and ‘loss of control’ increases the probability of disordered gaming by 77.77% while endorsement of ‘withdrawal’, ‘loss of control’ and ‘negative consequences’ increases the probability of disordered gaming by 26.66%. Moreover, lack of endorsement of ‘withdrawal’ and endorsement of ‘preoccupation’ increases the likelihood of disordered gaming by 7.14%. Taken together, the results obtained illustrate that different IGD criteria can present with different clinical weighing as unique diagnostic roles in the development of disordered gaming can be evidenced by each criterion. Moreover, the present findings help inform future revisions of diagnostic manuals and helps enhancing the assessment of IGD in the future. Additional research and clinical implications are discussed.
机译:互联网游戏障碍(IGD)已于2013年5月得到认可,可以使用美国精神病学协会(APA)制定的标准进行评估。本研究调查了每种IGD标准在诊断游戏异常中所起的作用。共有3377名参与者(平均年龄20岁= 4.3岁)参加了该研究。使用条件推理树(Ctree)(一种复杂的机器算法)对收集的数据进行仔细检查,以检测IGD的模式。参与者提供了基本的社会人口统计学信息,并完成了互联网游戏障碍量表(IGDS9-SF)。结果确定了与IGD相关的症状类别,表明赞同“退出”和“失去控制”会使无序游戏的可能性增加77.77%,而赞同“退出”,“失去控制”和“负面后果”则增加无序游戏的几率降低了26.66%。此外,缺乏对“提款”的认可和对“专注”的认可,会使游戏混乱的可能性提高了7.14%。综上所述,获得的结果表明,不同的IGD标准可以以不同的临床衡量标准呈现,因为每种标准都可以证明在无序游戏发展中的独特诊断作用。此外,目前的发现有助于将来诊断手册的修订,并有助于将来对IGD的评估。讨论了其他研究和临床意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号