首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Phylogeny and Identification of Nocardia Species on the Basis of Multilocus Sequence Analysis
【2h】

Phylogeny and Identification of Nocardia Species on the Basis of Multilocus Sequence Analysis

机译:基于多基因座序列分析的诺卡氏菌种的系统发生和鉴定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Nocardia species identification is difficult due to a complex and rapidly changing taxonomy, the failure of 16S rRNA and cellular fatty acid analysis to discriminate many species, and the unreliability of biochemical testing. Here, Nocardia species identification was achieved through multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) of gyrase B of the β subunit of DNA topoisomerase (gyrB), 16S rRNA (16S), subunit A of SecA preprotein translocase (secA1), the 65-kDa heat shock protein (hsp65), and RNA polymerase (rpoB) applied to 190 clinical, 36 type, and 11 reference strains. Phylogenetic analysis resolved 30 sequence clusters with high (>85%) bootstrap support. Since most clusters contained a single type strain and the analysis corroborated current knowledge of Nocardia taxonomy, the sequence clusters were equated with species clusters and MLSA was deemed appropriate for species identification. By comparison, single-locus analysis was inadequate because it failed to resolve species clusters, partly due to the presence of foreign alleles in 22.1% of isolates. While MLSA identified the species of the majority (71.3%) of strains, it also identified clusters that may correspond to new species. The correlation of the identities by MLSA with those determined on the basis of microscopic examination, biochemical testing, and fatty acid analysis was 95%; however, MLSA was more discriminatory. Nocardia cyriacigeorgica (21.58%) and N. farcinica (14.74%) were the most frequently encountered species among clinical isolates. In summary, five-locus MLSA is a reliable method of elucidating taxonomic data to inform Nocardia species identification; however, three-locus (gyrB-16S-secA1) or four-locus (gyrB-16S-secA1-hsp65) MLSA was nearly as reliable, correctly identifying 98.5% and 99.5% of isolates, respectively, and would be more feasible for routine use in a clinical reference microbiology laboratory.
机译:由于复杂且快速变化的分类法,16S rRNA和细胞脂肪酸分析无法区分多种物种以及生化测试的不可靠性,因此难以鉴定诺卡氏菌。在这里,诺卡氏菌的物种鉴定是通过对DNA拓扑异构酶(gyrB),16S rRNA(16S),SecA前蛋白转位酶(secA1)的A亚基,65 kDa热休克的β亚基回旋酶B的多基因座序列分析(MLSA)来实现的蛋白(hsp65)和RNA聚合酶(rpoB)应用于190个临床,36型和11个参考菌株。系统发育分析解决了30个具有高(> 85%)自举支持的序列簇。由于大多数簇都包含单一类型的菌株,并且该分析证实了诺卡氏菌分类学的当前知识,因此将序列簇与物种簇等同起来,并且认为MLSA适合进行物种鉴定。相比之下,单基因座分析是不充分的,因为它无法解析物种簇,部分原因是在22.1%的分离物中存在外来等位基因。 MLSA鉴定了大多数菌株的种类(71.3%),同时也鉴定了可能对应于新物种的簇。 MLSA的身份与在显微镜检查,生化测试和脂肪酸分析的基础上确定的身份的相关性为95%;但是,MLSA更具歧视性。在临床分离株中,诺卡氏诺卡氏菌(21.58%)和法氏猪笼草(14.74%)是最常见的物种。总而言之,五座位MLSA是阐明分类学数据以告知诺卡氏菌物种鉴定的可靠方法。然而,三位点(gyrB-16S-secA1)或四位点(gyrB-16S-secA1-hsp65)MLSA几乎一样可靠,分别正确鉴定出98.5%和99.5%的分离株,对于常规检测更可行在临床参考微生物学实验室中使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号