首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Tactile Discrimination Praxis and Cognitive Impulsivity in ADHD Children: A Cross-Sectional Study
【2h】

Tactile Discrimination Praxis and Cognitive Impulsivity in ADHD Children: A Cross-Sectional Study

机译:多动症儿童的触觉歧视实践和认知冲动:跨领域研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The study of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has traditionally focused on deficit of inhibitory control and cognitive impulsivity. However, the pathophysiology of ADHD has also been associated with the somatosensory cortex. The aim of this study was to explore if there were differences in tactile discrimination and praxis between neurotypical and ADHD children and whether these differences could be explained by cognitive impulsivity. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. The sample comprised 74 children aged 7 to 11 years divided in two groups: 43 with neurotypical development, 31 with ADHD. To assess tactile discrimination, the finger localization and the graphestesia tests were used. Praxis was assessed with the Kaufman Assesment Battery for Children (K-ABC) hand movement subtest, the action program and the Zoo Map subtests of the Behavioral Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome, and the complex figure of Rey–Osterrieth test (ROCF). Cognitive impulsivity was assessed using the Magallanes Computerized Impulsivity Scale test (EMIC). Results: Children with ADHD showed greater cognitive impulsivity ( = 0.038) and scored lower in Zoo Map ( = 0.023) and hand-movement subtests ( = 0.002), and in ROCF test ( = 0.004). Differences in praxis skills still remained after controlling by gender and cognitive impulsivity. Conclusion: Praxis deficit might have repercussions not only on the characterization of ADHD but also on its treatment.
机译:背景:注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的研究传统上集中于抑制性控制和认知冲动的缺陷。然而,ADHD的病理生理学也与体感皮层有关。这项研究的目的是探讨神经型和多动症儿童在触觉辨别和实践上是否存在差异,以及这些差异是否可以由认知冲动来解释。方法:进行横断面研究。该样本包括74名7至11岁的儿童,分为两组:43名具有神经典型发育,31名患有ADHD。为了评估触觉辨别力,使用了手指定位和验觉测试。使用考夫曼儿童评估电池(K-ABC)手运动子测验,行为障碍综合症行为评估的动作程序和Zoo Map子测验以及Rey-Osterrieth测验的复杂数字(ROCF)对实践进行了评估。认知冲动性使用麦哲伦计算机化冲动量表测试(EMIC)进行评估。结果:患有ADHD的儿童表现出更高的认知冲动(= 0.038),在Zoo Map(= 0.023)和手部动作子测试(= 0.002)和ROCF测试(= 0.004)中得分较低。在通过性别和认知冲动控制后,实践技巧仍存在差异。结论:实践缺陷可能不仅对ADHD的表征有影响,而且对治疗也有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号