首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Detection of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae by Use of Semiautomated Microbiology Systems and Manual Detection Procedures
【2h】

Detection of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae by Use of Semiautomated Microbiology Systems and Manual Detection Procedures

机译:使用半自动化微生物系统和手动检测程序检测肠杆菌科中的广谱β-内酰胺酶

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Three commercially available microbiology identification and susceptibility testing systems were compared with regard to their ability to detect extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production in Enterobacteriaceae, i.e., the Phoenix Automated Microbiology System (BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, MD), the VITEK 2 System (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France), and the MicroScan WalkAway-96 System (Dade Behring, Inc., West Sacramento, CA), using routine testing panels. One hundred fifty putative ESBL producers were distributed blindly to three participating laboratories. Conventional phenotypic confirmatory tests such as the disk approximation method, the CLSI double-disk synergy test, and the Etest ESBL were also evaluated. Biochemical and molecular characterization of β-lactamases performed at an independent laboratory was used as the reference method. One hundred forty-seven isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter aerogenes, Citrobacter freundii, Serratia marcescens, Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris, and Morganella morganii were investigated. Of these isolates, 85 were identified as ESBL producers by the reference method. The remaining isolates were identified as non-ESBL producers; they were either hyperproducers of their chromosomal AmpC, Koxy, or SHV enzymes or lacked any detectable β-lactamase activity. The system with the highest sensitivity for the detection of ESBLs was the Phoenix (99%), followed by the VITEK 2 (86%) and the MicroScan (84%); however, specificity was more variable, ranging from 52% (Phoenix) to 78% (VITEK 2). The performance of the semiautomated systems differed widely with the species investigated. The sensitivities of the conventional test methods ranged from 93 to 94%. The double-disk synergy test showed the highest specificity and positive predictive value among all test methods, i.e., 97% and 98%, respectively.
机译:比较了三种市售的微生物鉴定和药敏测试系统检测肠杆菌科细菌中广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)产生的能力,即Phoenix自动微生物系统(BD Diagnostic Systems,Sparks,MD),VITEK 2系统(使用法国Marcy l'Etoile的bioMérieux)和MicroScan WalkAway-96系统(使用加利福尼亚州西萨克拉曼多的Dade Behring公司)。一百五十个假定的ESBL生产者被盲目分发给三个参与实验室。还评估了常规的表型验证性测试,例如磁盘近似方法,CLSI双磁盘协同测试和Etest ESBL。在独立实验室进行的β-内酰胺酶的生化和分子表征用作参考方法。研究了一百四十七株大肠杆菌,肺炎克雷伯菌,产氧克雷伯菌,阴沟肠杆菌,产气肠杆菌,弗氏柠檬酸杆菌,粘质沙雷氏菌,变形杆菌,变形杆菌,寻常变形杆菌和摩根氏菌。在这些分离株中,通过参考方法鉴定出85个为ESBL产生者。其余的分离株被鉴定为非ESBL生产者。他们要么是染色体AmpC,Koxy或SHV酶的高产者,要么缺乏任何可检测到的β-内酰胺酶活性。对ESBLs的检测灵敏度最高的系统是Phoenix(99%),其次是VITEK 2(86%)和MicroScan(84%)。但是,特异性变化更大,范围从52%(Phoenix)到78%(VITEK 2)。半自动化系统的性能与所研究的物种差异很大。常规测试方法的灵敏度范围为93%至94%。在所有测试方法中,双盘协同测试显示最高的特异性和阳性预测值,分别为97%和98%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号