首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Clinical Evaluation of the Digene Hybrid Capture II Test and the COBAS AMPLICOR Monitor Test for Determination of Hepatitis B Virus DNA Levels
【2h】

Clinical Evaluation of the Digene Hybrid Capture II Test and the COBAS AMPLICOR Monitor Test for Determination of Hepatitis B Virus DNA Levels

机译:Digene Hybrid Capture II测试和COBAS AMPLICOR Monitor测试用于确定乙型肝炎病毒DNA水平的临床评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The measurement of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA is important for the assessment of liver disease and treatment efficacy. Most commercially available assays for the determination of HBV DNA levels have limited linear ranges. This study was performed to evaluate the clinical performance of the Digene Hybrid Capture II (Digene HC II assay) and the COBAS AMPLICOR Monitor test (COBAS-AM assay), with special emphasis on anti-HBV e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients with low HBV DNA levels. A total of 425 Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B were recruited. A total of 107 patients were HBeAg positive, and 318 patients were HBeAg negative. The Digene HC II assay and the COBAS-AM assay had similar intra-assay and interassay variabilities. A total of 264 patients (62.1%) had HBV DNA levels undetectable by the Digene HC II assay, and 47 patients (11.1%) had HBV DNA levels undetectable by the COBAS-AM assay (P < 0.001). For the 161 patients with HBV DNA levels detectable by the Digene HC II assay, the HBV DNA levels obtained by the Digene HC II assay and by the COBAS-AM assay showed an excellent correlation (r = 0.95; P < 0.001). The linear ranges of the Digene HC II assay and the COBAS-AM assay marginally overlapped. Before HBV DNA levels could be determined by the COBAS-AM assay, predilution had to be performed for 158 of 161 patients (98.1%) with HBV DNA levels detectable by the Digene HC II assay and for 10 of 264 patients (3.8%) with HBV DNA levels undetectable by the Digene HC II assay. The cost for assaying each serum sample by using different strategies was calculated. The COBAS-AM assay was more sensitive than the Digene HC II assay and more suitable for monitoring low levels of HBV viremia.
机译:乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)DNA的测量对于评估肝病和治疗效果非常重要。用于确定HBV DNA水平的大多数市售测定法的线性范围有限。这项研究的目的是评估Digene Hybrid Capture II(Digene HC II分析)和COBAS AMPLICOR Monitor试验(COBAS-AM分析)的临床表现,特别侧重于抗HBV e抗原(HBeAg)阳性的患者HBV DNA水平低。总共招募了425名中国慢性乙型肝炎患者。共有107例HBeAg阳性,而318例HBeAg阴性。 Digene HC II测定和COBAS-AM测定具有相似的测定内和测定间变异性。共有264例患者(62.1%)的Digene HC II检测无法检测到HBV DNA水平,47例患者(11.1%)的COBAS-AM检测无法检测到HBV DNA水平(P <0.001)。对于通过Digene HC II分析可检测到的161例HBV DNA水平,通过Digene HC II分析和COBAS-AM分析获得的HBV DNA水平显示出极好的相关性(r = 0.95; P <0.001)。 Digene HC II测定法和COBAS-AM测定法的线性范围略有重叠。在通过COBAS-AM分析确定HBV DNA水平之前,必须对Digene HC II分析可检测到的161名患者中的158名患者(98.1%)和264名患者中的264名患者中的10名进行预稀释(98.1%)。 Digene HC II分析无法检测到HBV DNA水平。计算了使用不同策略测定每个血清样品的成本。 COBAS-AM分析比Digene HC II分析更灵敏,更适合于监测低水平的HBV病毒血症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号