首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Development and Evaluation of a Quality-Controlled Ribosomal Sequence Database for 16S Ribosomal DNA-Based Identification of Staphylococcus Species
【2h】

Development and Evaluation of a Quality-Controlled Ribosomal Sequence Database for 16S Ribosomal DNA-Based Identification of Staphylococcus Species

机译:质量控制的核糖体序列数据库的开发和评估用于基于葡萄球菌16S核糖体DNA的鉴定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To establish an improved ribosomal gene sequence database as part of the Ribosomal Differentiation of Microorganisms (RIDOM) project and to overcome the drawbacks of phenotypic identification systems and publicly accessible sequence databases, both strands of the 5′ end of the 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) of 81 type and reference strains comprising all validly described staphylococcal (sub)species were sequenced. Assuming a normal distribution for pairwise distances of all unique staphylococcal sequences and choosing a reporting criterion of ≥98.7% similarity for a “distinct species,” a statistical error probability of 1.0% was calculated. To evaluate this database, a 16S rDNA fragment (corresponding to Escherichia coli positions 54 to 510) of 55 clinical Staphylococcus isolates (including those of the small-colony variant phenotype) were sequenced and analyzed by the RIDOM approach. Of these isolates, 54 (98.2%) had a similarity score above the proposed threshold using RIDOM; 48 (87.3%) of the sequences gave a perfect match, whereas 83.6% were found by searching National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database entries. In contrast to RIDOM, which showed four ambiguities at the species level (mainly concerning Staphylococcus intermedius versus Staphylococcus delphini), the NCBI database search yielded 18 taxon-related ambiguities and showed numerous matches exhibiting redundant or unspecified entries. Comparing molecular results with those of biochemical procedures, ID 32 Staph (bioMérieux, Marcy I'Etoile, France) and VITEK 2 (bioMérieux) failed to identify 13 (23.6%) and 19 (34.5%) isolates, respectively, due to incorrect identification and/or categorization below acceptable values. In contrast to phenotypic methods and the NCBI database, the novel high-quality RIDOM sequence database provides excellent identification of staphylococci, including rarely isolated species and phenotypic variants.
机译:建立改良的核糖体基因序列数据库作为微生物核糖体分化(RIDOM)项目的一部分,并克服表型鉴定系统和公众可访问的序列数据库的弊端,即16S核糖体DNA(rDNA)5'端的两条链对包括所有有效描述的葡萄球菌(亚)种的81种类型和参考菌株的序列进行了测序。假设所有唯一葡萄球菌序列的成对距离均呈正态分布,并为“不同物种”选择≥98.7%相似性的报告标准,则计算出1.0%的统计误差概率。为了评估该数据库,对55个临床葡萄球菌分离株(包括小菌落变异表型的分离株)的16S rDNA片段(对应于大肠杆菌第54至510位)进行了测序并通过RIDOM方法进行了分析。在这些分离株中,有54个(98.2%)的相似度得分高于使用RIDOM提出的阈值。其中48(87.3%)个序列完全匹配,而搜索国家生物技术信息中心(NCBI)数据库条目则发现83.6%。与RIDOM相比,它在物种水平上显示出四个歧义(主要涉及中间葡萄球菌与德尔菲葡萄球菌),而NCBI数据库搜索产生了18个与分类群相关的歧义,并显示了许多匹配项,这些重复项具有冗余或未指定的条目。将分子结果与生化方法的结果进行比较,ID 32 Staph(法国梅西市马西埃里奥市的bioMérieux)和VITEK 2(bioMérieux市)由于鉴定错误而未能分别鉴定出13种(23.6%)和19种(34.5%)分离株。和/或分类低于可接受的值。与表型方法和NCBI数据库相比,新型高质量RIDOM序列数据库可对葡萄球菌进行出色的鉴定,包括很少分离的物种和表型变异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号