首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Biology Therapy >Slight advantages of nimotuzumab versus cetuximab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
【2h】

Slight advantages of nimotuzumab versus cetuximab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

机译:尼莫妥珠单抗与西妥昔单抗联合同期放化疗在局部晚期食管鳞癌中的优势

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of nimotuzumab (Nimo) versus cetuximab (C225) plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). A total of 95 patients with LA-ESCC were retrospectively reviewed, including 65 in Nimo and 30 in C225. The results showed that the ORR in Nimo (61.0%; CR 22.0%, 13/59; PR 39.0% 23/59) was slightly higher than that in C225 (43.5%; CR 8.7%, 2/23; PR 34.8%, 8/23) but without significant difference ( = 0.81). The DCR was 79.7% vs. 73.9% in C225, favoring Nimo plus CCRT ( = 0.04). The median PFS in Nimo was significantly longer than that in C225 (19.6 months vs. 13.0 months, = 0.02). The median OS of the whole cohort, the Nimo group and the C225 group were 21.3, 24.5, and 20.9 months, respectively. The rates of OS at 1-, 3-year in Nimo were 77.7% and 33.5%, compared to 73.3% and 20.0% in C225 (HR = 1.17, = 0.23). Grade 3 or worse hematological toxicity and non-hematological toxicity (radiation esophagitis) in Nimo were similar with that in C225 (21.5% vs. 26.7%, = 0.91; 26.1% vs. 26.7%, = 0.56). No grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis occurred neither Nimo group nor C225 group. Nimo plus CCRT improved DCR and PFS of patients with LA-ESCC and had a tendency of prolonged survival compared to C225 plus CCRT. Our results suggest that the combination of Nimo and CCRT may be a reasonable option in this population.
机译:这项研究旨在比较尼莫妥珠单抗(Nimo)与西妥昔单抗(C225)加同步放化疗(CCRT)在局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(LA-ESCC)中的疗效。回顾性分析了总共95例LA-ESCC患者,其中Nimo患者65例,C225患者30例。结果显示,尼莫的ORR(61.0%; CR 22.0%,13/59; PR 39.0%23/59)略高于C225(43.5%; CR 8.7%,2/23; PR 34.8%, 8/23),但无显着差异(= 0.81)。 DCR为79.7%,而C225为73.9%,偏爱Nimo加CCRT(= 0.04)。 Nimo的中位PFS明显长于C225(19.6个月vs.13.0个月,= 0.02)。整个队列,Nimo组和C225组的中位OS分别为21.3、24.5和20.9个月。 Nimo在1年,3年时的OS率分别为77.7%和33.5%,而C225中的OS为73.3%和20.0%(HR = 1.17,= 0.23)。 Nimo的3级或更差的血液学毒性和非血液学毒性(放射性食管炎)与C225相似(21.5%对26.7%,= 0.91; 26.1%对26.7%,= 0.56)。 Nimo组和C225组均未发生≥3级放射性肺炎。与C225加CCRT相比,Nimo加CCRT可以改善LA-ESCC患者的DCR和PFS,并具有延长生存期的趋势。我们的结果表明,在该人群中,Nimo和CCRT的组合可能是一个合理的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号