首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Multicenter Comparison of the Digene Hybrid Capture CMV DNA Assay (Version 2.0) the pp65 Antigenemia Assay and Cell Culture for Detection of Cytomegalovirus Viremia
【2h】

Multicenter Comparison of the Digene Hybrid Capture CMV DNA Assay (Version 2.0) the pp65 Antigenemia Assay and Cell Culture for Detection of Cytomegalovirus Viremia

机译:Digene Hybrid Capture CMV DNA检测(2.0版)pp65抗原性检测和细胞培养检测巨细胞病毒性病毒血症的多中心比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We compared the Digene Hybrid Capture CMV DNA Assay version 2.0, the pp65 antigenemia assay, traditional tube culture, and shell vial culture for the detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia in several patient populations at three centers. Of 561 blood specimens collected from 402 patients, complete clinical and laboratory data were available for 489. Using consensus definitions for true positives and true negatives, the sensitivities of the Hybrid Capture assay, antigenemia, shell vial, and tube culture were 95, 94, 43, and 46%, respectively. The specificities of the Hybrid Capture assay and antigenemia were 95 and 94%, respectively. At all three study sites, the detected level of CMV viremia was significantly higher with the Hybrid Capture assay or antigenemia than with shell vial and tube culture. In a group of 131 healthy nonimmunosuppressed volunteers, the Hybrid Capture assay demonstrated a specificity of over 99%. The Hybrid Capture assay is a standardized assay that is simple to perform and can utilize whole blood specimens that have been stored for up to 48 h. The high sensitivity and specificity of the Hybrid Capture assay along with its simplicity and flexibility make it a clinically useful assay for the detection of CMV viremia in immunocompromised or immunosuppressed patients. Further evaluation to determine its role in predicting CMV disease and for monitoring the therapeutic response to anti-CMV therapy is needed.
机译:我们比较了Digene Hybrid Capture CMV DNA检测2.0版,pp65抗原血症检测,传统管培养和壳管培养,以检测三个中心几个患者群体中的巨细胞病毒(CMV)病毒血症。从402位患者收集的561个血液样本中,有489个完整的临床和实验室数据。使用对真阳性和真阴性的共识定义,杂交捕获测定,抗原血症,壳小瓶和试管培养的敏感性分别为95、94,分别为43%和46%。杂交捕获测定和抗原血症的特异性分别为95%和94%。在所有三个研究地点,杂交捕获测定法或抗原血症检测到的CMV病毒血症水平均显着高于壳管和试管培养法。在一组131名健康的非免疫抑制志愿者中,Hybrid Capture检测显示出超过99%的特异性。杂交捕获测定法是一种标准化测定法,操作简单,可以利用已保存长达48小时的全血标本。 Hybrid Capture检测方法的高灵敏度和特异性以及其简便性和灵活性使其成为检测免疫受损或免疫抑制患者中CMV病毒血症的临床有用检测方法。需要进一步评估以确定其在预测CMV疾病中的作用以及监测对抗CMV治疗的治疗反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号