首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of Culture- and Non-Culture-Based Methods for Quantification of Viral Load and Resistance to Antiretroviral Drugs in Patients Given Zidovudine Monotherapy
【2h】

Comparison of Culture- and Non-Culture-Based Methods for Quantification of Viral Load and Resistance to Antiretroviral Drugs in Patients Given Zidovudine Monotherapy

机译:齐多夫定单药治疗患者定量分析病毒载量和抗逆转录病毒药物的基于文化和非文化的方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Virological assays for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 load and drug resistance can broadly be divided into culture-based and molecular biology-based methods. Culture-based methods give a direct measure of infectious virus load and phenotypic drug resistance, whereas molecular biology-based methods are indirect, assaying nucleic acid levels to determine virus load and point mutations associated with drug resistance. We have compared culture-based and non-culture-based methods for patients enrolled in a placebo-controlled trial of zidovudine (the Concorde Trial). Virus loads were assayed by culture of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or quantitative PCR, and drug resistance was assayed in culture or in a quantitative, PCR-based point mutation assay. The rates of detection of viremia and drug resistance were higher by PCR than by culture for this population of subjects. Comparison of the virus loads by the two measures showed a good correlation for virus loads in PBMCs but a poor correlation for virus loads in plasma. The latter result probably reflected the inaccuracies of culture in assaying plasma with the low infectious virus titers seen in the study population. The concordance of phenotypic and genotypic drug resistance methods was high, with all phenotypically resistant isolates having at least one resistance-associated mutation and with no mutations being found in a drug-sensitive isolate. Genomic resistance scores (weighted sums of levels of resistance mutations) showed good correlations with the levels of phenotypic resistance, and both resistance measures were observed to increase as the duration of exposure to drug increased. Overall, non-culture-based methods were shown to correlate well with culture-based methods and offer a low-cost, high-throughput alternative. However, culture-based methods remain the final arbiters of infectious virus load and phenotypic drug resistance and are unlikely to be superseded entirely.
机译:人体免疫缺陷病毒1型负荷和耐药性的病毒学测定可大致分为基于培养的方法和基于分子生物学的方法。基于培养的方法可直接测量感染性病毒载量和表型耐药性,而基于分子生物学的方法则是间接的,可检测核酸水平以确定病毒载量和与耐药性相关的点突变。我们比较了参加齐多夫定安慰剂对照试验(协和试验)的患者的基于文化和非基于文化的方法。通过培养外周血单核细胞(PBMC)或定量PCR测定病毒载量,并在培养物中或在基于PCR的定量点突变测定中测定药物耐药性。通过PCR,该人群的病毒血症和耐药性检测率高于培养。两种方法对病毒载量的比较表明,PBMC中病毒载量具有良好的相关性,而血浆中病毒载量的相关性较差。后者的结果可能反映了在研究人群中发现感染性病毒滴度低的血浆时培养的准确性。表型和基因型耐药方法的一致性很高,所有表型耐药菌株均具有至少一个与耐药相关的突变,并且在药物敏感菌株中未发现突变。基因组抗药性评分(抗药性突变水平的加权总和)与表型抗药性水平具有良好的相关性,并且观察到两种抗药性措施都随着药物暴露时间的增加而增加。总体而言,非基于文化的方法与基于文化的方法具有很好的相关性,并提供了低成本,高通量的替代方法。然而,基于文化的方法仍然是传染性病毒载量和表型药物抗性的最终仲裁者,不可能完全被取代。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号