首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Advances in Medical Education and Practice >Multiple Mini-Interviews: Current Perspectives on Utility and Limitations
【2h】

Multiple Mini-Interviews: Current Perspectives on Utility and Limitations

机译:多次迷你访谈:实用程序和局限性的最新观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The growing role of healthcare professionals urged admissions committees to restructure their selection process and assess key personal attributes rather than academic achievements only. Multiple mini interviews (MMIs) were designed in 2002 to assess such domains in prospective healthcare professions. Being a high-stake assessment, the utility and limitations of MMI need to be explored. The purpose of this article is to review the available evidence to establish its utility. The claim of the reliability is verified by the studies assessing the effect of number of stations, duration of stations, format and scoring systems of stations and number of raters assessing the applicants. Similarly, by gathering evidence concerning its content validity, convergent/divergent correlation and predictive ability, validity is ensured. Finally, its acceptability and feasibility along with limitations is discussed. This article concludes by providing recommendations for further work required to deal with the limitations and enhance its utility.
机译:医疗保健专业人员的作用日益增强,这促使招生委员会重新调整其选拔流程并评估关键的个人特质,而不仅仅是学习成绩。 2002年设计了多个小型面试(MMI),以评估潜在医疗保健行业中的此类领域。作为一项高风险的评估,需要探索MMI的实用性和局限性。本文的目的是回顾可用的证据以建立其效用。通过评估站数,站的持续时间,站的格式和评分系统以及评估申请人数量的评分者的影响的研究证实了可靠性的要求。同样,通过收集有关其内容有效性,趋同/趋异相关性和预测能力的证据,可以确保有效性。最后,讨论了其可接受性和可行性以及局限性。本文最后提供了一些建议,以解决限制并增强其实用性所需的进一步工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号