首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Academic Pathology >How to Succeed in Fellowship Acquisition: A Survey of Pathology Residents
【2h】

How to Succeed in Fellowship Acquisition: A Survey of Pathology Residents

机译:如何获得研究金:病理学居民调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Medical school curricula limit students’ exposure to pathology practice while pathology subspecialty training programs require residents to apply for fellowships as early as the end of their first year of training. Thus, limited exposure to pathology practice creates significant confusion and anxiety, often making the fellowship application process premature. Additionally, early focus on subspecialty training in order to acquire a fellowship adds to the initial lack of emphasis on general pathology training. We prepared a voluntary online survey with questions developed through focus groups and advice from an expert in survey design to determine which fellowships are desired and how successful residents are in their pursuit of these fellowships. The survey was distributed through the Pathology Residency Program Directors' (PRODS) listserv. Answers were solicited from pathology trainees throughout the entire training cycle. There were 141 (4.6% response rate) total respondents with each postgraduate year represented. One hundred twenty-two (95%) of 129 residents plan on completing 1 or 2 fellowships after residency training. Encouragingly, 94 (75%) of 126 pathology residents attained their desired specialty fellowship. However, 32 (32%) of 99 residents who acquired at least one fellowship chose a general surgical pathology fellowship. Furthermore, 33 (24%) respondents had already decided to pursue a specific specialty while still in medical school. An additional 32 (23%) came to their decision during postgraduate year 1. Therefore, although most residents are successful in attaining their desired fellowship, further research is needed to understand the effect of early commitment to a subspecialty and its impact on pathology education.
机译:医学院的课程限制了学生对病理学实践的了解,而病理学专业培训计划要求居民最早在培训的第一年末申请奖学金。因此,对病理学实践的有限接触会造成明显的困惑和焦虑,这通常会使团契申请过程过早。此外,为了获得研究金,早期专注于亚专科培训增加了最初对一般病理学培训的重视。我们准备了一项自愿性在线调查,其中包含通过焦点小组提出的问题以及调查设计专家的建议,以确定需要哪些研究金,以及成功地寻求这些研究金的居民。该调查是通过“病理住院医师计划主管”(PRODS)名单服务分发的。在整个培训周期中,均向病理学学员征求答案。每个研究生年度共有141位受访者(回复率为4.6%)。 129位居民中的一百二十二位(95%)计划在进行驻地培训后完成1或2个研究金。令人鼓舞的是,在126位病理学住院医师中,有94位(75%)获得了所需的专业奖学金。但是,在获得至少一项研究金的99位居民中,有32位(32%)选择了一般外科病理学研究金。此外,有33名(24%)的受访者已经决定在仍在医学院的时候攻读特定专业。在研究生第一年,他们决定再增加32名(23%)。因此,尽管大多数居民都能成功获得所需的奖学金,但仍需要进一步研究以了解尽早承诺对亚专业的影响及其对病理学教育的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号