首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates giving discordant results in AccuProbe tests by PCR-restriction enzyme analysis 16S rRNA gene sequencing and DT1-DT6 PCR.
【2h】

Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates giving discordant results in AccuProbe tests by PCR-restriction enzyme analysis 16S rRNA gene sequencing and DT1-DT6 PCR.

机译:鸟分枝杆菌复合物分离物的分子特征在PCR限制酶分析16S rRNA基因测序和DT1-DT6 PCR中在AccuProbe测试中给出不一致的结果。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Based on cultural and biochemical tests, a total of 84 strains (72 clinical and 12 environmental isolates from the Caribbean Isles, Europe, and the Indian subcontinent) were identified as members of the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). They were further characterized with MAC, M. avium, and M. intracellulare probes of the AccuProbe system, and this was followed by selective amplification of DT6 and DT1 sequences. Seventy isolates gave concordant results; 63 were identified as M. avium, 5 were identified as M. intracellulare, and 24 remained untypeable by both methods. Fourteen isolates gave discrepant results, as they were DT1 positive but gave negative results by the M. intracellulare AccuProbe test. Consequently, a detailed molecular analysis of all DT1-positive isolates (14 discrepant strains plus 5 M. intracellulare strains) was performed by PCR-restriction analysis (PRA) of the hsp65 gene and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The results confirmed the reported heterogeneity of M. intracellulare, as only 6 of 19 isolates (32%) gave PRA results compatible with published M. intracellulare profiles while the rest of the isolates were grouped in four previously unpublished profiles. 16S rRNA gene sequencing showed that only 8 of 19 isolates (42%) were related to M. intracellulare IWGMT 90247 (EMBL accession no. ), the rest being related to MCRO19 (EMBL accession no. ) and MIWGTMR10 (EMBL accession no. ). In conclusion, we have characterized a significant number of MAC isolates which were not identified by the AccuProbe test, PRA, or 16S rRNA sequencing. However, all of them were identifiable by DT1-DT6 PCR (they were DT6 negative and DT1 positive) and could be tentatively identified as M. intracellulare based on previously published observations. It is noteworthy that the majority of such isolates (14 of 19) were from the Indian subcontinent, with 12 of 14 being environmental isolates. Our study confirms the marked heterogeneity of M. intracellulare isolates and shows the utility of in-house DT1 PCR to detect this group of isolates, which would otherwise have been missed by the AccuProbe system in a routine clinical microbiology laboratory.
机译:根据文化和生化测试,总共鉴定出了84株菌株(来自加勒比岛,欧洲和印度次大陆的72株临床菌株和12株环境分离株)是鸟分枝杆菌复合体(MAC)的成员。它们用AccuProbe系统的MAC,鸟分枝杆菌和胞内分枝杆菌探针进一步鉴定,然后选择性扩增DT6和DT1序列。七十个分离株得到一致的结果。用这两种方法鉴定出63株为鸟分枝杆菌,5株为胞内分枝杆菌,还有24株无法分型。 14株分离物给出了不同的结果,因为它们是DT1阳性,但通过细胞内分枝杆菌AccuProbe测试给出了阴性结果。因此,通过hsp65基因的PCR限制分析(PRA)和16S rRNA基因测序,对所有DT1阳性分离株(14个不同菌株加上5个胞内菌株)进行了详细的分子分析。结果证实了报道的胞内分枝杆菌的异质性,因为19个分离株中只有6个(32%)给出的PRA结果与已公布的胞内分枝杆菌谱兼容,而其余的分离株则被分组为四个以前未发表的谱。 16S rRNA基因测序显示19个分离株中只有8个(42%)与胞内分枝杆菌IWGMT 90247(EMBL登录号)有关,其余与MCRO19(EMBL登录号)和MIWGTMR10(EMBL登录号)有关。 。总而言之,我们已经表征了许多尚未通过AccuProbe测试,PRA或16S rRNA测序鉴定的MAC分离株。然而,所有这些都可以通过DT1-DT6 PCR进行鉴定(它们是DT6阴性和DT1阳性),并且可以根据以前发表的观察结果初步鉴定为胞内分枝杆菌。值得注意的是,大多数此类分离株(19个中的14个)来自印度次大陆,其中14个中的12个是环境分离株。我们的研究证实了胞内分枝杆菌的明显异质性,并显示了内部DT1 PCR在检测这组分离物中的实用性,否则在常规临床微生物学实验室中AccuProbe系统会漏掉这些分离物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号