首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A Linguistic Comparison of Letters of Recommendation for Male and Female Chemistry and Biochemistry Job Applicants
【2h】

A Linguistic Comparison of Letters of Recommendation for Male and Female Chemistry and Biochemistry Job Applicants

机译:男女化学和生物化学求职者推荐信的语言比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Letters of recommendation are central to the hiring process. However, gender stereotypes could bias how recommenders describe female compared to male applicants. In the current study, text analysis software was used to examine 886 letters of recommendation written on behalf of 235 male and 42 female applicants for either a chemistry or biochemistry faculty position at a large U.S. research university. Results revealed more similarities than differences in letters written for male and female candidates. However, recommenders used significantly more standout adjectives to describe male as compared to female candidates. Letters containing more standout words also included more ability words and fewer grindstone words. Research is needed to explore how differences in language use affect perceivers’ evaluations of female candidates.
机译:推荐信对于招聘过程至关重要。然而,与男性申请人相比,性别刻板印象可能会偏向推荐者描述女性的方式。在当前的研究中,使用文字分析软件检查了代表235名男性和42名女性申请者的886封推荐信,这些推荐人是美国大型研究型大学的化学或生物化学教职。结果显示,男性和女性候选人写的信比相似之处多于差异。但是,与女性候选人相比,推荐人使用的男性形容词明显更多。包含更多杰出单词的字母还包括更多能力单词和更少磨石单词。需要进行研究以探讨语言使用差异如何影响感知者对女性候选人的评价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号