首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Texture perception through direct and indirect touch: An analysis of perceptual space for tactile textures in two modes of exploration
【2h】

Texture perception through direct and indirect touch: An analysis of perceptual space for tactile textures in two modes of exploration

机译:通过直接和间接触摸进行纹理感知:两种探索方式下的触觉纹理感知空间分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Considerable information about the texture of objects can be perceived remotely through a probe. It is not clear, however, how texture perception with a probe compares with texture perception with the bare finger. Here we investigate the perception of a variety of textured surfaces encountered daily (e.g., corduroy, paper, and rubber) using the two scanning modes—direct touch through the finger and indirect touch through a probe held in the hand—in two tasks. In the first task, subjects rated the overall pair-wise dissimilarity of the textures. In the second task, subjects rated each texture along three continua, namely, perceived roughness, hardness, and stickiness of the surfaces, shown previously as the primary dimensions of texture perception in direct touch. From the dissimilarity judgment experiment, we found that the texture percept is similar though not identical in the two scanning modes. From the adjective rating experiments, we found that while roughness ratings are similar, hardness and stickiness ratings tend to differ between scanning conditions. These differences between the two modes of scanning are apparent in perceptual space for tactile textures based on multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis. Finally, we demonstrate that three physical quantities, vibratory power, compliance, and friction carry roughness, hardness, and stickiness information, predicting perceived dissimilarity of texture pairs with indirect touch. Given that different types of texture information are processed by separate groups of neurons across direct and indirect touch, we propose that the neural mechanisms underlying texture perception differ between scanning modes.
机译:可以通过探针远程感知有关对象纹理的大量信息。然而,不清楚探针的质感与裸露的手指质感如何比较。在这里,我们使用两种扫描模式(通过手指直接触摸和通过手持探头间接触摸)对每天遇到的各种纹理表面(例如灯芯绒,纸张和橡胶)的感知进行调查。在第一个任务中,受试者对纹理的整体成对差异进行了评分。在第二项任务中,受试者沿着三个连续性对每个纹理进行评级,即连续感知到的粗糙度,硬度和表面的黏性,先前显示为直接接触中纹理感知的主要维度。从相异性判断实验中,我们发现两种扫描模式下的纹理感知相似但不相同。从形容词评级实验中,我们发现尽管粗糙度评级相似,但在扫描条件之间硬度和粘性评级却往往有所不同。在基于多维缩放(MDS)分析的触觉纹理的感知空间中,两种扫描模式之间的这些差异是显而易见的。最后,我们证明了三个物理量(振动力,柔度和摩擦力)具有粗糙度,硬度和粘性信息,它们通过间接触摸预测了纹理对的感知不相似性。假设不同类型的纹理信息由直接和间接触摸之间的不同神经元组处理,我们建议,基于纹理感知的神经机制在扫描模式之间是不同的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号