首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >An Examination of the Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
【2h】

An Examination of the Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

机译:优势和困难问卷的收敛性和判别效度检验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study examined the factor structure of the parent and teacher versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; R. ) with a sample of first-grade children at risk for educational failure. The 5-factor model previously found in studies using exploratory factor analysis was fit to the data for both parent and teacher questionnaires. Fit indices for both versions were marginally adequate. Model fit was comparable across gender and ethnic groups. Factor fit for the parent questionnaire was invariant across parent educational level. The examination of convergent and discriminant validity included peer evaluations of each SDQ construct. Thus, each of the five constructs was evaluated by three sources (parent, teacher, and child). On the basis of multitrait–multimethod approach as well as a confirmatory factor analysis using the correlated uniqueness model, the SDQ has good convergent validity but relatively poor discriminant validity.
机译:这项研究调查了“优势与困难问卷”(SDQ; R.)的父母和教师版本的因素结构,并分析了面临教育失败风险的一年级儿童的样本。先前在探索性因素分析研究中发现的5因子模型适合于父母和教师问卷的数据。两种版本的拟合指数都足够。不同性别和种族群体的模型拟合具有可比性。适合父母问卷的因素在父母教育水平上是不变的。收敛性和判别有效性的检查包括每个SDQ结构的同级评估。因此,五个构造中的每一个都由三个来源(父母,老师和孩子)进行评估。基于多特征-多方法方法以及使用相关唯一性模型的验证性因素分析,SDQ具有良好的收敛效度,但判别效度相对较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号