首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Dietary patterns in pregnant women: a comparison of food frequency questionnaires and four-day prospective diaries
【2h】

Dietary patterns in pregnant women: a comparison of food frequency questionnaires and four-day prospective diaries

机译:孕妇的饮食习惯:食物频率问卷和四天前瞻性日记的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is growing interest in the use of dietary patterns as measures of exposure in studies of diet-disease relationships. However, relatively little is known about the impact of the type of dietary assessment method on the patterns observed. Using food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and food diary data collected from 585 women in early pregnancy we used principal component analysis to define dietary patterns. The first pattern was very similar in both datasets and was termed the ‘prudent’ diet. The second pattern, whilst comparable for the FFQ and food diaries, showed greater variation in coefficients than the prudent pattern; it was termed the ‘Western’ diet. Differences between the FFQ and diary scores were calculated for each woman for both the prudent and Western diet patterns. 95% of the differences in the prudent diet score lay within ±1.58 standard deviations of the mean, and 95% of the differences in the Western diet scores lay within ±2.22 standard deviations of the mean. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were 0.67 (P < 0.001) for the prudent diet score and 0.35 (P < 0.001) for the Western diet score. The agreement between the FFQ and diary scores was lowest amongst respondents who were younger, had lower educational attainment and whose diaries were coded as ‘poor, probably incomplete’, although these effects were small. The first two dietary patterns identified in this cohort of pregnant women appear to be defined similarly by both FFQ and diary data, suggesting that FFQ data provide useful information on dietary patterns.
机译:在饮食-疾病关系研究中,人们越来越关注使用饮食方式作为暴露量。但是,关于饮食评估方法类型对观察到的模式的影响知之甚少。使用食物频率调查表(FFQ)和从585名早期妊娠妇女中收集的食物日记数据,我们使用主成分分析来定义饮食模式。第一个模式在两个数据集中都非常相似,被称为“谨慎”饮食。第二种模式虽然与FFQ和食物日记相当,但与谨慎模式相比,系数变化更大。它被称为“西方”饮食。对于每位女性,无论是谨慎饮食方式还是西方饮食方式,都计算出FFQ和日记分数之间的差异。审慎饮食评分的差异的95%在平均值的±1.58标准偏差内,而西方饮食评分的95%的平均值在平均值的±2.22标准偏差内。谨慎饮食评分的Pearson相关系数为0.67(P <0.001),西方饮食评分的Pearson相关系数为0.35(P <0.001)。 FFQ和日记成绩之间的一致性在年龄较小,教育程度较低且日记被编码为“差,可能不完整”的受访者中最低,尽管这些影响很小。 FFQ和日记数据似乎对这组孕妇中确定的前两种饮食模式进行了相似的定义,表明FFQ数据提供了有关饮食模式的有用信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号