首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Privacy and Technology: Folk Definitions and Perspectives
【2h】

Privacy and Technology: Folk Definitions and Perspectives

机译:隐私和技术:民间定义和观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this paper we present preliminary results from a study of individual differences in privacy beliefs, as well as relate folk definitions of privacy to extant privacy theory. Focus groups were conducted with young adults aged 18–28 and older adults aged 65–75. Participants first shared their individual definitions of privacy, followed by a discussion of privacy in six scenarios chosen to represent a range of potentially invasive situations. Taken together, Westin’s and Altman’s theories of privacy accounted for both younger and older adults’ ideas about privacy, however, neither theory successfully accounted for findings across all age and gender groups. Whereas males tended to think of privacy in terms of personal needs and convenience, females focused more on privacy in terms of others, respecting privacy rights, and safety. Older adults tended to be more concerned about privacy of space rather than information privacy. Initial results reinforce the notion that targeting HCI design to the user population, even with respect to privacy, is critically important.
机译:在本文中,我们提供了对隐私信念的个体差异进行研究的初步结果,并将民间的隐私定义与现存的隐私理论联系起来。焦点小组针对18-28岁的年轻人和65-75岁的成年人进行。参与者首先分享他们对隐私的各自定义,然后在六个场景中讨论隐私,这些场景被选择代表一系列潜在的入侵情况。综上所述,威斯汀和奥特曼的隐私权理论解释了年轻人和老年人的隐私权观念,但是,这两个理论都未能成功地解释所有年龄段和性别群体的发现。男性倾向于根据个人需求和便利考虑隐私,而女性则更多地关注他人的隐私,尊重隐私权和安全性。老年人倾向于更关注空间的隐私,而不是信息的隐私。最初的结果强化了这样一种观念,即即使是在隐私方面,以HCI设计为目标用户群也至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号