首页> 外文期刊>Current Science: A Fortnightly Journal of Research >Revisit to definitions and need for inventorization or registration of landrace, folk, farmers' and traditional varieties
【24h】

Revisit to definitions and need for inventorization or registration of landrace, folk, farmers' and traditional varieties

机译:重新审视定义,地方化,民间,农民和传统品种的清单化或注册需求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In recent times, certain definitions related with landraces, folk varieties, farmers varie-ties, traditional varieties are causing con-fusion. This situation has arisen because of inconsistencies and lack of agreement among the agriculture/plant scientists re-garding their definition, while dealing with same or different material(s). Further, the recent legislations, namely Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Right (PPVFR) Act~1 2001 and Biological Diver-sity Act~2 2002 also define them with apurpose of protection of farmers' rights and benefit sharing. Therefore, there is a necessity to properly understand and de-fine them with consistency based on cer-tain genetic principles. There have been no genetic guidelines for consistent clas-sification of such related taxa and the people are not refraining from adding to the appalling list of terms in the litera-ture. We propose here a genetic focus for the terms already in use. It is important for countries like India belonging to old civilizations where first domestication of many plant species occurred and the lo-cals/farmers contributed significantly in the evolution of agriculture and agricul-tural products. This would help in en-forcement of above legislations in the right spirit and empowerment of farmers to enable protection of their rights and en-sure benefit sharing to farmers or farming communities, accruing from the com-mercialization of products developed us-ing their basic products and knowledge, as envisaged by the Convention on Biolo-ical Diversity.
机译:近年来,与地方品种,民间品种,农民品种,传统品种有关的某些定义引起了混乱。之所以出现这种情况,是因为在处理相同或不同材料的同时,农业/植物科学家之间在重新定义时也不一致,并且缺乏共识。此外,最近的法律,即2001年《植物新品种和农民权利保护法》(PPVFR)和2002年《生物多样性法》,2002年2月,也以保护农民权利和利益共享为目的对它们进行了定义。因此,有必要根据某些遗传原理正确地理解和定义它们的一致性。尚无有关此类相关分类的统一分类的遗传学指导,人们也不会在该术语中添加令人震惊的术语。我们在这里建议对已经使用的术语进行遗传关注。对于像印度这样属于旧文明的国家来说,这一点很重要,在这些国家中,许多植物物种都首次被驯化,当地/农民在农业和农用产品的发展中做出了重要贡献。这将有助于秉承正确的精神执行上述法律,增强农民的权能,从而保护他们的权利,并确保将利用其基本产品开发的产品商业化所产生的惠益分享给农民或农业社区《生物多样性公约》所设想的产品和知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号