首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Fast food fruits and vegetables prices’ association with dietary intakes among US adults: Is there modification by family income?
【2h】

Fast food fruits and vegetables prices’ association with dietary intakes among US adults: Is there modification by family income?

机译:快餐水果和蔬菜的价格与美国成年人的饮食摄入量相关:家庭收入是否有所改变?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We examined effects of prices of fast foods (FF) and fruits and vegetables (FV) on dietary intake, body mass index (BMI) and obesity risks and whether the associations varied across groups according to their family income. Data from the US Department of Agriculture Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII, 1994–96) for 7,331 individuals aged 20–65 years with complete data on two 24-hr recalls were used. We computed two food price indices (FFPI and FVPI) which were linked to individuals through geocoded identifiers. Main outcomes included dietary intakes of energy, selected nutrients and food groups, fast food consumption, and diet quality measured using two indices (HEI and aMED), BMI and obesity. Interaction terms between key variables were tested in regression analyses and in further stratified analysis by family income. Higher fast food prices (FFPI) were associated with higher, fiber intake, low saturated fat, and better overall diet quality as measured by aMED. FVPI was positively associated with improved dietary quality as well in terms of lower cholesterol and sodium intakes, improved HEI and lower BMI. Most of these associations showed homogeneous strengths across income groups as evidenced by a non-significant FFPI*PIR or FVPI*PIR interaction term (p<0.10). While increasing FFPI by one standard deviation was only borderline protective against FF consumption (OR=0.89; 95% CI: 0.78, 1.02), its association with other binary outcomes that were considered was non-significant. In contrast, FVPI was protective against obesity, particularly among the near poor. It was also associated with improved aMED score (OR: 2.22; 95% CI: 1.22, 4.03). Analyses of these national data suggest that changing fast food and fruit and vegetable prices may affect people’s dietary quality and to some extent their adiposity, although the present study is limited by the available food price data.
机译:我们研究了快餐(FF)和水果和蔬菜(FV)的价格对饮食摄入,体重指数(BMI)和肥胖风险的影响,以及协会之间是否因家庭收入而异。使用美国农业部个人食物摄入量连续调查(CSFII,1994-96)中的数据,该数据涉及7,331名20-65岁的个体,并提供了两次24小时召回的完整数据。我们计算了两个食品价格指数(FFPI和FVPI),它们通过地理编码的标识符链接到个人。主要结果包括饮食中的能量摄入,选定的营养物质和食物类别,快餐消费以及使用两个指数(BMI和肥胖)衡量的饮食质量。在回归分析和家庭收入的进一步分层分析中,对关键变量之间的相互作用项进行了检验。如aMED所述,较高的快餐价格(FFPI)与较高的纤维摄入,低饱和脂肪和较好的整体饮食质量有关。 FVPI与改善饮食质量以及降低胆固醇和钠摄入量,改善HEI和降低BMI呈正相关。这些协会中的大多数协会在各个收入群体之间均显示出同等的实力,这通过不显着的FFPI * PIR或FVPI * PIR相互作用项来证明(p <0.10)。虽然将FFPI增加一个标准差只是对FF食用的临界保护(OR = 0.89; 95%CI:0.78,1.02),但将其与其他被认为是二元结果的关联无关紧要。相比之下,FVPI可以预防肥胖,特别是在贫困人群中。它还与改善的aMED得分相关(或:2.22; 95%CI:1.22、4.03)。对这些国家数据的分析表明,快餐和果蔬价格的变化可能会影响人们的饮食质量,并在一定程度上影响人们的肥胖程度,尽管目前的研究受到可用的食物价格数据的限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号