首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >How Many Days Was That? We’re Still Not Sure But We’re Asking the Question Better!
【2h】

How Many Days Was That? We’re Still Not Sure But We’re Asking the Question Better!

机译:那是多少天?我们仍然不确定但是我们问的问题更好!

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Unreliable measures limit the ability to detect relationships with other variables. Day-to-day variability in measurement is a source of unreliability. Studies vary substantially in numbers of days needed to reliably assess physical activity. The required numbers of days has probably been underestimated due to violations of the assumption of compound symmetry in using the intraclass correlation. Collecting many days of data become unfeasible in real-world situations. The current dilemma could be solved by adopting distribution correction techniques from nutrition or gaining more information on the measurement model with generalizability studies. This would partition the variance into sources of error that could be minimized. More precise estimates of numbers of days to reliably assess physical activity will likely vary by purpose of the study, type of instrument, and characteristics of the sample. This work remains to be done.
机译:不可靠的措施限制了检测与其他变量之间的关系的能力。测量的日常变化是不可靠的根源。为了可靠地评估身体活动,研究的天数差异很大。由于违反了使用类内相关的复合对称性假设,所需的天数可能被低估了。在现实世界中,收集许多天的数据变得不可行。当前的两难局面可以通过采用营养方面的分布校正技术或通过推广性研究获得有关测量模型的更多信息来解决。这会将方差划分为可以最小化的误差源。可靠评估身体活动的天数的更精确估算可能会因研究目的,仪器类型和样品特性而异。这项工作有待完成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号