首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of the Staph-Ident System with a Conventional Method for Species Identification of Urine and Blood Isolates of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci
【2h】

Comparison of the Staph-Ident System with a Conventional Method for Species Identification of Urine and Blood Isolates of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci

机译:金黄色葡萄球菌身份系统与常规方法的凝结酶阴性葡萄球菌尿液和血液分离物种类鉴定的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Staph-Ident system (Analytab Products) for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci was compared with the conventional method of Kloos and Schleifer (21). A total of 101 clinical isolates from urine cultures and 95 clinical isolates from blood cultures were studied: overall agreement between the two methods was 86%. We concluded that the Staph-Ident system is a practical test for most clinical microbiology laboratories and that results obtained from this rapid test are comparable to those obtained from the more cumbersome conventional method. Additional investigations are needed to determine the clinical relevance of such species identification.
机译:将用于鉴定凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌的Staph-Ident系统(Analytab Products)与传统的Kloos和Schleifer方法进行了比较(21)。总共研究了101种来自尿培养物的临床分离株和95种来自血培养物的临床分离株:两种方法之间的总体一致性为86%。我们得出的结论是,对于大多数临床微生物学实验室而言,Staph-Ident系统是一项实用的测试,从该快速测试中获得的结果与从较繁琐的常规方法中获得的结果相当。需要进行其他调查以确定此类物种鉴定的临床相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号