首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AAPS PharmSciTech >Product quality research institute evaluation of cascade impactor profiles of pharmaceutical aerosols part 3: Final report on a statistical procedure for determining equivalence
【2h】

Product quality research institute evaluation of cascade impactor profiles of pharmaceutical aerosols part 3: Final report on a statistical procedure for determining equivalence

机译:产品质量研究机构对药用气雾剂级联冲击曲线的评估第3部分:确定等效性的统计程序的最终报告

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this article is to report final results of the evaluation of a chi-square ratio test proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for demonstrating equivalence of aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) profiles of nasal and orally inhaled drug products. A working group of the Product Quality Research Institute previously published results demonstrating some limitations of the proposed test. In an effort to overcome the test’s limited discrimination, the group proposed a supplemental test, a population bioequivalence (PBE) test for impactor-sized mass (ISM). In this final report the group compares the chi-square ratio test to the ISM-PBE test and to the combination of both tests. The basis for comparison is a set of 55 realistic scenarios of cascade impactor data, which were evaluated for equivalence by the statistical tests and independently by the group members. In many instances, the combined application of these 2 tests appeared to increase the discriminating ability of the statistical procedure compared with the chi-square ratio test alone. In certain situations the chi-square ratio test alone was sufficient to determine equivalence of APSD profiles, while in other situations neither of the tests alone nor their combination was adequate. This report describes all of these scenarios and results. In the end, the group did not recommend a statistical test for APSD profile equivalence. The group did not investigate other in vitro tests, in vivo issues, or other statistical tests for APSD profile comparisons. The studied tests are not intended for routine quality control of APSD.
机译:本文的目的是报告美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)提出的卡方比检验的最终评估结果,以证明鼻和口服吸入药物产品的空气动力学粒度分布(APSD)曲线是等效的。产品质量研究所的一个工作组先前发布了结果,证明了所建议测试的某些局限性。为了克服该测试的局限性,该小组提出了一项补充测试,即针对撞击物大小的质量(ISM)的种群生物等效性(PBE)测试。在这份最终报告中,小组将卡方比检验与ISM-PBE检验以及两种检验的组合进行了比较。比较的基础是一组55个级联冲击器数据的现实场景,这些场景通过统计测试进行了等效性评估,并由小组成员独立评估。在许多情况下,与单独的卡方比检验相比,这两种检验的组合应用似乎增加了统计程序的判别能力。在某些情况下,仅使用卡方比检验即可确定APSD轮廓的等效性,而在其他情况下,单独使用一项检验或将其组合都不够。该报告描述了所有这些情况和结果。最后,该小组不建议对APSD轮廓等效性进行统计检验。该小组未调查其他体外测试,体内问题或其他用于APSD轮廓比较的统计测试。研究的测试并非旨在对APSD进行常规质量控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号