首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Digital Imaging >Virtual Machine Performance Benchmarking
【2h】

Virtual Machine Performance Benchmarking

机译:虚拟机性能基准测试

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The attractions of virtual computing are many: reduced costs, reduced resources and simplified maintenance. Any one of these would be compelling for a medical imaging professional attempting to support a complex practice on limited resources in an era of ever tightened reimbursement. In particular, the ability to run multiple operating systems optimized for different tasks (computational image processing on Linux versus office tasks on Microsoft operating systems) on a single physical machine is compelling. However, there are also potential drawbacks. High performance requirements need to be carefully considered if they are to be executed in an environment where the running software has to execute through multiple layers of device drivers before reaching the real disk or network interface. Our lab has attempted to gain insight into the impact of virtualization on performance by benchmarking the following metrics on both physical and virtual platforms: local memory and disk bandwidth, network bandwidth, and integer and floating point performance. The virtual performance metrics are compared to baseline performance on “bare metal.” The results are complex, and indeed somewhat surprising.
机译:虚拟计算的吸引力包括:降低成本,减少资源和简化维护。对于在日益严格的报销时代中,在有限的资源上支持复杂实践的医学影像专业人士而言,这些因素中的任何一个都会令人信服。特别是,在单个物理计算机上运行针对不同任务(Linux上的计算图像处理与Microsoft操作系统上的办公任务)而优化的多个操作系统的能力非常引人注目。但是,也存在潜在的缺点。如果要在正在运行的软件必须到达多层磁盘驱动程序或网络接口之前通过多层设备驱动程序执行的环境中执行高性能要求,则必须仔细考虑这些要求。我们的实验室尝试通过在物理和虚拟平台上对以下指标进行基准测试来了解虚拟化对性能的影响:本地内存和磁盘带宽,网络带宽以及整数和浮点性能。将虚拟性能指标与“裸机”上的基准性能进行比较。结果很复杂,确实有些令人惊讶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号