首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Tobacco control global health policy and development: towards policy coherence in global governance
【2h】

Tobacco control global health policy and development: towards policy coherence in global governance

机译:控烟全球卫生政策和发展:朝着全球治理政策的连贯性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) demonstrates the international political will invested in combating the tobacco pandemic and a newfound prominence for tobacco control within the global health agenda. However, major difficulties exist in managing conflicts with foreign and trade policy priorities, and significant obstacles confront efforts to create synergies with development policy and avoid tensions with other health priorities. This paper uses the concept of policy coherence to explore congruence and inconsistencies in objectives, policy, and practice between tobacco control and trade, development and global health priorities. Following the inability of the FCTC negotiations to satisfactorily address the relationship between trade and health, several disputes highlight the challenges posed to tobacco control policies by multilateral and bilateral agreements. While the work of the World Bank has demonstrated the potential contribution of tobacco control to development, the absence of non-communicable diseases from the Millennium Development Goals has limited scope to offer developing countries support for FCTC implementation. Even within international health, tobacco control priorities may be hard to reconcile with other agendas. The paper concludes by discussing the extent to which tobacco control has been pursued via a model of governance very deliberately different from those used in other health issues, in what can be termed ‘tobacco exceptionalism’. The analysis developed here suggests that non-communicable disease (NCD) policies, global health, development and tobacco control would have much to gain from re-examining this presumption of difference.
机译:世卫组织关于烟草控制(FCTC)的框架公约表明,国际政治将投入打击烟草大流行和全球卫生议程内的烟草控制的新发现突出。然而,在管理与外国和贸易政策优先事项的冲突中存在重大困难,以及重大障碍面对与发展政策产生协同效应,并避免与其他健康优先事项的紧张局势。本文采用政策一致性的概念,探索目标,政策和贸易,发展和全球卫生优先事项的目标,政策和实践中的同时和不一致。在FCTC谈判令人满意地满足贸易和健康之间的关系之后,若干争议突出了多边和双边协定对烟草管制政策提出的挑战。虽然世界银行的工作表明了烟草控制发展的潜在贡献,但千年发展目标的非传染性疾病的缺失具有有限的范围,以提供发展中国家对FCTC实施的支持。即使在国际健康范围内,烟草控制优先事项也可能很难与其他议程协调。本文通过讨论了通过一定程度的治理模式讨论了烟草控制的程度,非常刻意地与其他健康问题所用的模式不同,可以被称为“烟草异常主义”。此处开发的分析表明,非传染性疾病(NCD)政策,全球卫生,发展和烟草控制将从重新检查这种差异的推定方面具有很大的差异。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    Jeff Collin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(21),2
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 274–280
  • 总页数 17
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号