首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases >Use of Oral Cholera Vaccine and Knowledge Attitudes and Practices Regarding Safe Water Sanitation and Hygiene in a Long-Standing Refugee Camp Thailand 2012-2014
【2h】

Use of Oral Cholera Vaccine and Knowledge Attitudes and Practices Regarding Safe Water Sanitation and Hygiene in a Long-Standing Refugee Camp Thailand 2012-2014

机译:2012-2014年泰国长期难民营中口服霍乱疫苗的使用以及关于安全饮水卫生和卫生的知识态度和做法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) are relatively new public health interventions, and limited data exist on the potential impact of OCV use on traditional cholera prevention and control measures—safe water, sanitation and hygiene (WaSH). To assess OCV acceptability and knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs) regarding cholera and WaSH, we conducted cross-sectional surveys, 1 month before (baseline) and 3 and 12 months after (first and second follow-up) a preemptive OCV campaign in Maela, a long-standing refugee camp on the Thailand-Burma border. We randomly selected households for the surveys, and administered questionnaires to female heads of households. In total, 271 (77%), 187 (81%), and 199 (85%) households were included in the baseline, first and second follow-up surveys, respectively. Anticipated OCV acceptability was 97% at baseline, and 91% and 85% of household members were reported to have received 1 and 2 OCV doses at first follow-up. Compared with baseline, statistically significant differences (95% Wald confidence interval not overlapping zero) were noted at first and second follow-up among the proportions of respondents who correctly identified two or more means of cholera prevention (62% versus 78% and 80%), reported boiling or treating drinking water (19% versus 44% and 69%), and washing hands with soap (66% versus 77% and 85%); a significant difference was also observed in the proportion of households with soap available at handwashing areas (84% versus 90% and 95%), consistent with reported behaviors. No significant difference was noted in the proportion of households testing positive for Escherichia coli in stored household drinking water at second follow-up (39% versus 49% and 34%). Overall, we observed some positive, and no negative changes in cholera- and WaSH-related KAPs after an OCV campaign in Maela refugee camp. OCV campaigns may provide opportunities to reinforce beneficial WaSH-related KAPs for comprehensive cholera prevention and control.
机译:口服霍乱疫苗(OCV)是相对较新的公共卫生干预措施,关于使用OCV对传统霍乱预防和控制措施-安全用水,卫生设施和卫生(WaSH)的潜在影响的数据有限。为了评估OCV的可接受性以及有关霍乱和WaSH的知识,态度和实践(KAP),我们进行了横断面调查,即先发性OCV活动之前(基线)1个月以及之后(第一次和第二次随访)3个月和12个月。在泰国和缅甸边境长期存在的难民营Maela。我们随机选择家庭进行调查,并向女性户主发放问卷。基线,第一次和第二次随访调查分别包括271(77%),187(81%)和199(85%)户。在基线时,预期的OCV接受度为97%,据报道有91%和85%的家庭成员在首次随访时接受了1和2剂OCV剂量。与基线相比,在第一和第二次随访中,正确识别出两种或多种霍乱预防方法的受访者比例有统计学上的显着差异(95%Wald置信区间不重叠零)(62%比78%和80% ),据报沸腾或处理饮用水(19%比44%和69%),并用肥皂洗手(66%比77%和85%);在洗手区有肥皂的家庭比例中也观察到了显着差异(84%对90%和95%),与报告的行为一致。在第二次随访中,存储的家庭饮用水中大肠杆菌检测呈阳性的家庭比例没有显着差异(39%比49%和34%)。总体而言,在Maela难民营进行OCV运动后,我们发现与霍乱和WaSH相关的KAP出现了积极变化,而没有消极变化。 OCV运动可能会提供机会,加强有益的与WaSH相关的KAP,以全面预防和控制霍乱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号