首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The use of group sequential designs with common competing risks tests
【2h】

The use of group sequential designs with common competing risks tests

机译:使用常见竞争风险测试的组序列设计

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Clinical trials are often performed using a group sequential design in order to allow investigators to review the accumulating data sequentially and possibly terminate the trial early for efficacy or futility. Standard methods for comparing survival distributions have been shown under varying levels of generality to follow an independent increments structure. In the presence of competing risks, where the occurrence of one type of event precludes the occurrence of another type of event, researchers may be interested in inference on the cumulative incidence function, which describes the probability of experiencing a particular event by a given time. This manuscript shows that two commonly used tests for comparing cumulative incidence functions, a pointwise comparison at a single point, and Gray's test, also follow the independent increments structure when used in a group sequential setting. A simulation study confirms the theoretical derivations even for modest trial sample sizes. Two examples of clinical trials in hematopoietic cell transplantation are used to illustrate the techniques.
机译:为了使研究者能够顺序查看累积的数据,并可能因有效性或无效性而尽早终止试验,通常使用小组顺序设计进行临床试验。已经显示了在不同普遍性水平下遵循独立增量结构比较生存分布的标准方法。在存在竞争风险的情况下,一种事件的发生排除了另一种事件的发生,研究人员可能会对推断累积发生率函数感兴趣,该函数描述了在给定时间经历特定事件的概率。该手稿显示,在组顺序设置中使用时,用于比较累积入射函数的两个常用测试,单个点的逐点比较和Gray检验也遵循独立的增量结构。仿真研究证实了理论推导,即使是适度的试验样本量也是如此。造血细胞移植的两个临床试验示例用于说明该技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号