首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Evaluating Spatial-Temporal Dynamics of Net Primary Productivity of Different Forest Types in Northeastern China Based on Improved FORCCHN
【2h】

Evaluating Spatial-Temporal Dynamics of Net Primary Productivity of Different Forest Types in Northeastern China Based on Improved FORCCHN

机译:改进型FORCCHN评估不同森林类型的净初级生产力的时空动态东北基于中国

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An improved individual-based forest ecosystem carbon budget model for China (FORCCHN) was applied to investigate the spatial-temporal dynamics of net primary productivity of different forest types in northeastern China. In this study, the forests of northeastern China were categorized into four ecological types according to their habitats and generic characteristics (evergreen broadleaf forest, deciduous broadleaf forest, evergreen needleleaf forest and deciduous needleleaf forest). The results showed that distribution and change of forest NPP in northeastern China were related to the different forest types. From 1981 to 2002, among the forest types in northeastern China, per unit area NPP and total NPP of deciduous broadleaf forest were the highest, with the values of 729.4 gC/(m2•yr) and 106.0 TgC/yr, respectively, followed by mixed broadleaf- needleleaf forest, deciduous needleleaf forest and evergreen needleleaf forest. From 1981 to 2002, per unit area NPP and total NPP of different forest types in northeastern China exhibited significant trends of interannual increase, and rapid increase was found between the 1980s and 1990s. The contribution of the different forest type’s NPP to total NPP in northeastern China was clearly different. The greatest was deciduous broadleaf forest, followed by mixed broadleaf- needleleaf forest and deciduous needleleaf forest. The smallest was evergreen needleleaf forest. Spatial difference in NPP between different forest types was remarkable. High NPP values of deciduous needleleaf forest, mixed broadleaf- needleleaf forest and deciduous broadleaf forest were found in the Daxing’anling region, the southeastern of Xiaoxing’anling and Jilin province, and the Changbai Mountain, respectively. However, no regional differences were found for evergreen needleleaf NPP. This study provided not only an estimation NPP of different forest types in northeastern China but also a useful methodology for estimating forest carbon storage at regional and global levels.
机译:运用改进的中国基于个体的森林生态系统碳收支模型(FORCCHN)研究了中国东北不同森林类型的净初级生产力的时空动态。在本研究中,根据东北森林的生境和一般特征将其分为四种生态类型(常绿阔叶林,落叶阔叶林,常绿针叶林和落叶针叶林)。结果表明,东北地区森林NPP的分布和变化与不同森林类型有关。 1981年至2002年,东北地区的森林类型中,落叶阔叶林的单位面积NPP和总NPP最高,分别为729.4 gC /(m 2 •yr)和106.0分别以TgC / yr为单位,然后是阔叶-针叶林,落叶针叶林和常绿针叶林。 1981年至2002年,中国东北不同森林类型的单位面积NPP和总NPP呈现年际增长的显着趋势,并在1980年代至1990年代之间迅速增长。东北地区不同森林类型的NPP对总NPP的贡献显然不同。最大的是落叶阔叶林,其次是阔叶-针叶林和落叶针叶林。最小的是常绿的针叶林。不同森林类型之间的NPP空间差异显着。分别在大兴安岭地区,小兴安岭东南部和吉林省以及长白山地区发现落叶针叶林,阔叶-针叶混交林和落叶阔叶林的NPP值较高。但是,没有发现常绿针叶NPP的区域差异。这项研究不仅提供了中国东北地区不同森林类型的NPP估算,而且为估算区域和全球层面的森林碳储量提供了有用的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号